User talk:Demostene
A tag has been placed on Ypoem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Ypoem. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Don't delete the speedy deletion tag from the page. If you want to even think its got a chance of being kept I suggest you sort out the picture link RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Final warning, remove the speedy deletion tag again and you will be reported and blocked from editing RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Since your final warning you have removed the speedy deletion tag twice - stop it, you have already been reported RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Final warning, remove the speedy deletion tag again and you will be reported and blocked from editing RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
My familiarity with wikipedia is new, I am not aware of how it works and I do not understand very well the edit tags and procedure. The argument for the word itself stands as a concept and should not be removed. If links are not allowed under the ground of private content then they should be removed. Ypoem is a new form of art and its description as means of expression and timline should remain. Since its meaning has allready been determined prior, I do not see an objection of it being in the wikipedia encyclopedia.