Talk:Cheren
edit war and accusations of meatpuppetry
[edit]75.25.103.109 and Bw2cool can you both stop edit warring eachother and settle things here on the talk page before you get banned for both going over 3RR, also 75.25.103.109 stop calling everyone a meatpuppet its uncivil, I'm not a meatpuppet im an uninvolved editor and i'm here to make sure you both settle this peacefully--Lerdthenerd (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- See here; the editor who reverted me only did so because Bws2cool told him to. --75.25.103.109 (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- yes but if you keep reverting people and putting it back you'll be in trouble for 3RR as well, also don't call people meatpuppets in your edit summaries its uncivil--Lerdthenerd (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have a brain and can think for myself IP, thank you very much. Sure, I am a member of the Pokémon WikiProject, and sure, I read the post. He DID NOT ask me to do anything, but merely pointed my attention to this page, where I FORMED MY OWN CONCLUSIONS. This page does not meet WP:NOTE, if it is reverted again, not only will I report you for violating the three-revert-rule, but I will bring the article to AfD, where the process will be much longer than it needed to be. Stop attacking people who disagree with you and follow policy. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- If you want the page to go to AfD and get deleted, then fine. We will do that. I am just trying to save time, which is allowed. The character is not notable, so they don't need an article. The only Pokemon characters with articles are Ash Ketchum, Brock, and Misty. That is for a reason. They are the only notable characters. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Wrong. --75.149.70.22 (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Prove it. The policy on notability (ie. outside of the franchise's universe) is what determines whether a subject has an article, a small mention in a list, or no mention at all. We have all searched but found nothing determining this notability for any of the other characters. If you can find sources which show notability (this being development information on the design and/or personality, and how the character has influenced culture) then by all means present them to us (for this character or for any of the myriad of others). Melicans (talk, contributions) 14:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Wrong. --75.149.70.22 (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- If you want the page to go to AfD and get deleted, then fine. We will do that. I am just trying to save time, which is allowed. The character is not notable, so they don't need an article. The only Pokemon characters with articles are Ash Ketchum, Brock, and Misty. That is for a reason. They are the only notable characters. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have a brain and can think for myself IP, thank you very much. Sure, I am a member of the Pokémon WikiProject, and sure, I read the post. He DID NOT ask me to do anything, but merely pointed my attention to this page, where I FORMED MY OWN CONCLUSIONS. This page does not meet WP:NOTE, if it is reverted again, not only will I report you for violating the three-revert-rule, but I will bring the article to AfD, where the process will be much longer than it needed to be. Stop attacking people who disagree with you and follow policy. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- You keep defending this article, but you are not giving us anything on why it is notable, with Wikipedia's guidelines. Articles need reliable third party sources talking about the subject in detail. If you can find us some sources that do this, then this character can have an article. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)