Search results

stigmatised, prefer person-first terminology—arguing, for example, that seizures are epileptic, people are not. An example of person-first terminology would...

much in Wikipedia policies and guidelines about the specific use of person-first language. Granted, I do see a small section about the importance of using...

English should be used and not necessarily "person first" terminology. I'm not saying that "person first" won't be right sometimes, too; just that the...

of person first terminology to be correct. For reference: Many patient groups, particularly those that have been stigmatised, prefer person-first terminology...

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Person-first language has been criticized by some Autistic, Deaf, ADHD, Dys*ic, Bipolar...

it. As for person-first, you miss the point, which is that the style guides you keep pointing to turned out to be dead wrong on person-first, so you'll...

guide that includes: "It is best to use language that refers to the person first and the disability second. For example: “The writer, who has a disability”...

shouldn’t restrict the first sentence to the nationality under which a person first became WP-notable if they were notable for accomplishments under multiple...

just means "affected by". But the phrasing "person afflicted by" is person-first, it's not as derogatory as "suffering from" and it is disease-context-specific...

"Ludography" in headings for biographies Person-first language 87 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 222#Person-first language Discussion related to MOS...