User:HughD/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:02, 29 August 2015

Enforcing administrator failed to "specifying the misconduct for which the sanction has been issued" as required by WP:ACDS#7.4, no specific behavior cited beyond a wave of the hands in the direction of two ANI filings, no policy or guideline cited, as if the two ANI filings alone, in the same week, justified the sanction, independent of the determination.

Enforcing administrator failed to "explain their enforcement actions" as required by WP:ACDS#6.1, dismissing legitimate requests for explanations under threat of administrative retribution:

The prior discussions are self-evident and I don't find it necessary to explain the concerns any further. It is self-evident and insulting to our collective intelligence if you want act like it's unclear what the various ANI discussions are referring to. If you want to continue to argue (even about the topic ban itself), it may be raised to a block and an extended topic ban.

Enforcing administrator filed to "elicit the opinions of other administrators at AE" "prior to placing sanctions that are likely to be controversial" as advised by WP:ACDS#7.3.

Enforcing administrator failed to include appeal process in topic ban notification. as required by WP:ACDS#7.4.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+* Enforcing administrator {{diff2|674970329| failed to "specifying the misconduct for which the sanction has been issued"}} as required by [[WP:ACDS#7.4]], no specific behavior cited beyond a wave of the hands in the direction of two ANI filings, no policy or guideline cited, as if the two ANI filings alone, in the same week, justified the sanction, independent of the determination.
-Donors Trust was characterized as "a dark-money ATM funding the conservative movement," referring to [[dark money]], that is, funds given to nonprofit organizations that can receive unlimited donations and are not required to disclose their donors,<ref name=CRP-PN>{{cite web |year=2015 |title=Political Nonprofits |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/nonprof_summ.php |website=opensecrets.org |publisher=[[Center for Responsive Politics]] |accessdate=March 10, 2015}}</ref> and referring metaphorically to [[automatic teller machine]]s (ATMs), by ''[[The Guardian]]'',<ref>{{cite news |title=Secretive donors gave US climate denial groups $125m over three years |url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/09/secretive-donors-gave-us-climate-denial-groups-125m-over-three-years |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |accessdate= 2015-06-11 |first1=Suzanne |last1=Goldenberg |authorlink1=Suzanne Goldenberg |first2=Helena |last2=Bengtsson |date=June 9, 2015 |quote=The anonymous cash flow came from two secretive organisations – the Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund – that have been called the “Dark Money ATM” of the conservative movement.}}</ref> [[Salon (website)|Salon]],<ref>{{cite news |date=October 23, 2013 |title=Defying Koch cash and D.C. gridlock, airport town will vote on a $15 minimum wage |first=Josh |last=Eidelson |accessdate=August 19, 2015 |publisher=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |url=http://www.salon.com/2013/10/23/defying_koch_cash_and_d_c_gridlock_airport_town_will_vote_on_a_15_minimum_wage/ |quote=Federal filings show donations from Donors Trust — a group supported by Charles and David Koch that Mother Jones’ Andrew Kroll called the “dark-money ATM of the conservative movement”...}}</ref> the ''[[National Review]]'',<ref name=nr20140924/> the ''[[Business Insider]]'',<ref name = "businessinsider"> ''[[The American Spectator]]'',<ref>{{cite news |last1=Zeiser |first1=Bill |title=Is The “Dark-Money” Apocalypse Upon Us? |magazine=[[The American Spectator]] |url=http://spectator.org/blog/60484/dark-money-apocalypse-upon-us |date=September 24, 2014 |accessdate=August 19, 2015 |quote=Kroll wrote a piece early last year branding DonorsTrust, a conservative-leaning donor advised fund, as the "Dark Money ATM of the Conservative Movement."}}</ref> the ''[[Huffington Post]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=The One Percenters: How A Handful Of California Power Brokers Work To Further Inequality |first=Bill |last=Raden |date=February 2, 2015 |accessdate=March 15, 2015 |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/19/california-one-percent_n_6714666.html |work=[[Huffington Post]] |quote=Dubbed “the dark money ATM of the conservative movement,” DT (and its sister trust, Donors Capital Fund), is a “donor advised fund” that offers its wealthy libertarian patrons both anonymity and guarantees of ideological purity by funding assaults on labor unions, climate scientists, public schools and economic regulations of all stripes.}}</ref> ''[[Democracy Now!]]'',<ref name=democracynow20130219a>{{cite news |title=Donors Trust: Little-Known Group Helps Wealthy Backers Fund Right-Wing Agenda in Secret |url=http://www.democracynow.org/2013/2/19/donors_trust_little_known_group_helps |first=Amy |last=Goodman |authorlink=Amy Goodman |date=February 19, 2013 |accessdate=March 15, 2015 |work=[[Democracy Now!]] |quote=The most detailed accounting to date shows Donors Trust funds a wish list of right-wing causes, prompting Mother Jones magazine to label it "the dark-money ATM of the right."}}</ref> and ''[[Moyers and Company]]''.<ref name=moyers>{{cite news |title=Donors Trust: The ATM for Climate Denial |date=February 21, 2013 |first=Theresa |last=Riley |work=[[Moyers and Company]] |publisher=Public Affairs Television |accessdate=June 9, 2015 |url=http://billmoyers.com/2013/02/21/donors-trust-the-atm-for-climate-denial/ |quote=According to Mother Jones and The Guardian newspaper, over the past decade, a little-known group called Donors Trust has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars from wealthy contributors to a host of right-wing organizations, advocacy groups and think tanks. MJ‘s Andy Kroll dubs it the “dark-money ATM of the right” because of all the conservative campaigns the group had bankrolled.}}</ref> Donors Trust was characterized as "the ATM for climate denial" by ''[[Moyers and Company]]''<ref name=moyers/> and ''[[Democracy Now!]]''.<ref name=democracynow20130219b>
+# [[WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive892#Concerns about the behavior of User:HughD]]
+# 15:13, 31 July 2015 [[WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive894#RfC spamming, canvasing, cross posting. User: HughD]]
+* Enforcing administrator {{diff2|675064058| failed to "explain their enforcement actions"}} as required by [[WP:ACDS#6.1]], dismissing legitimate requests for explanations under threat of administrative retribution:
+<blockquote>The prior discussions are self-evident and I don't find it necessary to explain the concerns any further. It is self-evident and insulting to our collective intelligence if you want act like it's unclear what the various ANI discussions are referring to. If you want to continue to argue (even about the topic ban itself), it may be raised to a block and an extended topic ban.</blockquote>
+* Enforcing administrator filed to "elicit the opinions of other administrators at AE" "prior to placing sanctions that are likely to be controversial" as advised by [[WP:ACDS#7.3]].
+* Enforcing administrator failed to include appeal process in {{diff2|678240669|topic ban notification.}} as required by [[WP:ACDS#7.4]].