Alden Brooks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Charles Darnay (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 3 November 2010 (Restoreds entry amplifying and correcting Nishidama's misleading citation from Rollins.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Alden Brooks (1882 - 1964), was an American writer and former Harvard English teacher, chiefly remembered for his proposal that Sir Edward Dyer wrote the works of Shakespeare.

Brooks was in born in Cleveland, Ohio. He attended schools in both France and England, before graduating from Harvard University in 1905. After teaching at Harvard and as an instructor at the U.S. Naval Academy, he became for a time a tobacco farmer in southern Maryland. He married Hilma Chadwick, an artist, at St. Ives, Cornwell, England, on 11 July 1908, and moved to France. They had four children.[1][2]

World War I

Brooks’s pieces originally written during WWI for Collier’s were collected for his first book.

World War I broke out while Brooks was in France, and he became an ambulance driver and subsequently a newspaper correspondent for The New York Times and Collier's. He eventually took up duty as an ambulance driver for American troops on the front line. He was eager to join the A.E.F and thought the quickest way would be to study in a French artillery school. He served with the French Army and rose to the rank of lieutenant of a field battery,[3] after his petition for transfer to the American forces was turned down on the grounds of poor eyesight. He saw action at Marne, Chemin-des-Dames, Chateau-Thierry and Meuse-Argonne, and was awarded the Croix de Guerre with a silver star for gallantry while engaged in special missions in France on July 15 and 16, 1918. He deplored much of what he saw, including how General Robert Lee Bullard sent American troops to fight and die even though the Armistice was due to be declared in a few hours, and wrote of war's folly:

War is stupid, insensate, unheroic to the last degree. War is not waged like a game. Analogies of the football field and of the chessboard are completely erroneous. War is a brutal chaos, governed by no laws.[4]

He was awarded the Croix de Guerre with silver star by the French government.[5]

Brooks published his first book, The Fighting Men, in 1917. It consisted of a series of six short sketches depicting the respective psychological and behavioural traits of an ethnic group of soldiers, respectively English, Slav, American, French, Belgian and Prussian.

Brooks lived for a long period in France, and his home in Paris, Maison Brooks built in 1929, was designed by the architect Paul Nelson.[6] His experiences of the war are recounted in his 1929 book Battle in 1918, As Seen by an American in the French Army, published in the United States as As I Saw It.[7]

His theories on Shakespeare

Aside from a novel, Escape (1924), Brooks published three times on the Shakespeare Authorship Question, first in 1937 when he published pr a preliminary volume, Will Shakspere: Factotum and Agent, in an attempt to prove that Shakespeare did not write the works attributed to him.[8] In this book, Shakespeare is considered to be a pseudonym, and the sonnets are attributed to Thomas Nashe, Samuel Daniel. Barnabe Barnes and some other editorial hand.It was short listed by the New York Times as one of the two best books on Shakespeare published in 1937.

Hyder Rollins, a contemporary scholar, reviewing Brooks's ideas commented that although "there is absolutely no evidence to support any of his statements (this) disturbed neither Brooks nor his publishers."( :[9].Rollins in the same publication brought scores of similar accusations against distinguished scholars who did not share his own views.In fact Rollins was such a fanatic that he even denied the very existence of the Earl of Oxford's son by Anne Vavasour.

 For more accurate information on Brooks ,Hemingway and their publisher and mutual friend,Maxwell Perkins, see A.Scott Berg," Max Perkins: Editor of Genius", New York: E.P.Dutton, 1978,page 398, and further documentation added by Warren Hope in "The Shakespeare Controversy:An Analysis,"2d edition,2009.
  
 
 

Six years later Brooks fulfilled his earlier promise of identifying the supposed real author by publishing Will Shakspere and the Dyer's Hand (1943) declaring that Sir Edward Dyer was the true author. His methodology consisted of specifying 54 criteria or qualifications which worked to the exclusion of the many false claimants the establishment of the true author's identity, only all of which his candidate, Sir Edward Dyer, was thought to meet in "concordance with the pattern".[10] The book, in the ironical words of one historian of the phenomenon, "did not ignite a crusade".[11]

    An anonymous reviewer for Time Magazine summed up the plot in the following way:-

He depicts Shakespeare as a butcher's son in Stratford, "a country youth who has to leave school early in order to assist his father in the killing of cattle . . . one who sows his wild oats so liberally that he must, first, marry against his will a woman eight years his senior, and, secondly, run away to London, apparently to escape legal prosecution." . . . . in London he got a job holding theatergoers' horses. Soon he earned enough money to rent out theatrical costumes and furnishings. Something of a wit in his coarse way, he began editing plays for production, soon became a play agent, buying and renting the works of others. On the side he kept a brothel: "In his tavern in Deadman's Lane, sub-leased to Widow Lee, Will Shakspere . . . created . . . a roistering hubbub." His "broken, almost falsetto voice" became a feature of London life. His "fat body" was soon "taxed by excesses." Many suffered from "his scheming tricks ... his dirty dealing and underhand passing of coin, all the shabby pretense in the double-faced glutton and roisterer." Meanwhile a grey-haired courtier with "wrinkled visage, deep-set eyes . . . walked nervously in the gardens" a stone's throw from Will's brothel. The courtier's name was Sir Edward Dyer, known to literati mainly as the author of a rather smug poem called My Mind to Me a Kingdom Is. No one guessed his secret, but for years, says Author Brooks, Dyer had been getting Shakespeare to buy bad plays for him and had rewritten them into the classics we read today.[12]</blockquote

While the Time review misquotes Brooks in many respects,his major contention that pandering,rather than literature, was one of Will's more lucrative sources of income was fully corroborated in the recent publication,"The Lodger"(Charles Nicholl,2008) and acceped without protest in most mainstream publications which reviewed the work.


He overcame the problem that Dyer died in 1607, several years before Shakespeare's The Tempest is believed to have been written, by a detailed exposition designed to show that passages in Sterling's "Darius" written in the early seventeenth century are clearly copied from 'The Tempest".In this he followed earlier Stratfordian critics such as Joseph Hunter(1839),Albert Cohn(1865),Karl Elze(1874),Janet Spens(1922),and Andrew Cairncross(1936).

Assessments

Brook's vivid depictions of soldiers and war have been highly praised by specialists. Phillip K. Jason argues that he wrote "two of the most intriguing books about World War 1."[13] His researches attempting to reveal Sir Edward Dyer behind Shakespeare have usually been dismissed as fantasies. William M. Murphy writes:

To a man who can tell us so much about Shakespeare on no visible evidence, no flight of illogical fancy is impossible.[14]

Unfortunately for Murphy since he failed to document a single citation in eleven pages he was justly justly ignored by all subsequent commentators,possibly because he ,like the anonymous Time reviewer falsely stated that there was "no visible evidence" that Shakespeare was in the pandering business.

 Brooks has  decisively influenced three recent independent researcher into the authorship heterodoxy. Diana Price who , in her book Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography (2001) writes on her acknowledgements page of "the ground-breaking research of Alden Brooks".[15] and John Michel and Roger Parisious in "Who Wrote Shakespeare",1995.

Bibliography

  • Escape, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1924
  • As I Saw It, Knopf, New York, 1930
  • Will Shakspere: Factotum and Agent,Round Table 1937
  • Will Shakspere and the Dyer's Hand,"Scribner's, 1943

" "This Side of Shakespeare",Vantage,New York 1964

Footnotes

  1. ^ Harvard College Class of 1905, Fourth Report. Norwood, Mass.: Plimpton Press, June 1920, p. 41.
  2. ^ Report of the secretary of the class of 1871 of Harvard college. Cambridge: Riverside Press, 1921, p. 38.
  3. ^ Jason & Graves 2001, p. 47
  4. ^ Time Magazine 1930, p. 2
  5. ^ Time Magazine 1930, p. 2
  6. ^ Midant 2004, p. 663
  7. ^ Jason & Graves 2001, p. 47
  8. ^ Wadsworth 1958, p. 139
  9. ^ Rollins 1944, p. 46
  10. ^ Wadsworth 1958, p. 141
  11. ^ Wadsworth 1958, p. 140
  12. ^ "Books: The Bard for Today" in Time Magazine 15 Feb 1943.
  13. ^ Jason, Phillip K. "The War Writings of Alden Brooks" in U.S. Naval Academy 2001 Summary of Research Report.
  14. ^ Murphy, William M. (1964) "Thirty-six plays in Search of an Author" in Union College Symposium 3(3), 4-11.
  15. ^ Price 2001, p. xi


References

  • The Bard for Today, Time Magazine, 15 February 1943, pp. 1–3
  • Rollins, Hyder Edward (1944), Adams, Joseph Quincy (ed.), The Sonnets, A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare, vol. 25 Part 11, J.B. Lippencott Company