The decline reason was wrong. Assuming the station article has a credible claim of significance, it should have been declined for that reason. Redirecting...
184 KB (25,918 words) - 22:39, 21 September 2021
Summit indicated any disagreement with deletion itself. So it was eligible to be nominated for speedy deletion again. PS: I declined the second one but...
199 KB (28,951 words) - 12:51, 16 February 2022
page, but I would likely decline the G6 on account of it (I've declined db-moves for much less). But the move itself, without any external influence, is...
190 KB (27,146 words) - 22:07, 21 May 2023
ones?) and a new CSD "Non-notable AfC Submissions" I think a new decline reason for the hopeless ones is better to separate out the most obvious ones...
188 KB (27,036 words) - 13:48, 16 July 2021
space for failing standards XYZ makes this meaningless. This proposal wouldn't allow people any time at all to address certain decline reasons because...
95 KB (12,382 words) - 00:46, 23 July 2018
Separately, there's no reason for concern about incorrectly-tagged G14s that were declined. This happens all the time, for every speedy deletion criterion...
198 KB (28,281 words) - 01:02, 2 June 2022
who worked on it as they would have any chance to address the third decline (they might not even see the reason before the draft gets deleted). There...
197 KB (28,405 words) - 00:59, 20 June 2021
to AfD. "Declined by an admin" is too strong, any good-faith decline should be enough. Say " ..has been declined once, for a plausible reason stated in...
360 KB (52,832 words) - 10:29, 21 April 2023
as well as depriving them of viewing the reasons given for declining by the reviewer. I see no reason why any of this requires a change to speed deletion...
302 KB (43,493 words) - 14:08, 4 March 2023
last month. The CSD was declined with the reason that G4 doesn't apply to drafts. I believe the implicit reason for the decline was that a page deleted...
193 KB (26,396 words) - 01:02, 27 February 2023
User:Dank55/csd whenever I declined a speedy tagged by a registered account; these days, I always put the reason for declining the speedy on my own talk...
503 KB (74,129 words) - 00:29, 5 June 2022
contributions of the original authors might make a clear "policy-based" reason for declining the de-author request. I'm personally leaning towards "sometimes"...
186 KB (28,178 words) - 13:12, 9 March 2023
disputed|reason}} and start a discussion. This is where we must simply trust the judgement of the closing admin to either delete, decline or list on FFD for more...
510 KB (73,294 words) - 05:07, 14 March 2023
standards, will decline it. For these reasons, the fact that a draft has been declined does not reliably indicate that the draft doesn't "have any chance of...
375 KB (54,334 words) - 17:23, 14 November 2022
been declined with edit summary Decline speedy - something that is made up certainly exists. I find this odd: not existing is not the only reason for regarding...
515 KB (75,741 words) - 17:21, 21 February 2023
"keep but redirect" at MfD for such drafts, and would probably decline a G6 for such cases. There are several reasons for this: If the draft was created...
197 KB (25,946 words) - 00:57, 27 February 2021
I may have been declining too many, & it may even look like desire to keep my acceptance rate at AfD immaculate However, my reason is that in some cases...
194 KB (26,257 words) - 00:54, 17 September 2018
the reason for the proposed speedy deletion has been discussed and was deemed not worthy of removal, decline the speedy deletion. If the reason for the...
506 KB (74,871 words) - 10:06, 21 March 2023
declined or deleted for a different reason altogether, along the lines of "Hi, I reviewed your CSD on article but declined it / changed it to reason <optional...
503 KB (74,072 words) - 18:15, 1 March 2023
year old. As for D3, and the concept of age–invulnerability to speedy in general, it seems to me that since a speedy can be declined by any editor other...
511 KB (68,673 words) - 21:11, 19 February 2023