Search results
Only searching in pages whose title starts with "Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard" (Search all pages)
The page '"examiner.com"' does not exist; did you mean "examiner.com"? If not, you can create a draft and submit it for review or request that a redirect be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 38 (section Request to reopen discussion on examiner.com)deciding the fate of examiner.com. My specific comments on the archive criticism: examiner.com masquerades as a newspaper - examiner.com is owned by a publishing...253 KB (36,680 words) - 05:42, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35 (section examiner.com = paid blogging, no editorial oversight)address your concerns but to search the archives for examiner.com, use quotes (i.e. "examiner.com"). I didn't find anything, but I thought this tip might...253 KB (35,834 words) - 05:42, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 100 (section Examiner.com and essay contests as sources on subject for which ample scholarly literature exists)discussing here is the reliability of Examiner.com. If you have anything related to reliability of examiner.com, please state it in this section. If Jrtayloriv's...304 KB (45,556 words) - 12:30, 14 March 2023
- the Oath Keepers that are on the Examiner.com website in the Wikipedia article about Oath Keepers. Is Examiner.com considered a RS? The articles are...265 KB (36,763 words) - 08:47, 30 January 2023
- 2009 (UTC) No, not even close to reliable. It's doubtful any person on examiner.com has an legitimate "expert status". They're just bloggers selected based...258 KB (36,692 words) - 09:08, 26 May 2022
- May 2015 (UTC) Patch.com is a pro-am site, much like the blacklisted examiner.com. It's not a newspaper, nor all that reliable. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:31...192 KB (27,198 words) - 23:36, 18 March 2023
- someone used it or it hasn't been questioned doesn't make it legit. Examiner.com was used in dozens of articles before it was blacklisted. In the previous...249 KB (34,547 words) - 04:40, 4 May 2022
- MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/October 2009#Examiner.com. I'll also add that examiner.com still appears in a lot of articles probably because...266 KB (36,220 words) - 18:28, 14 April 2023
- Gawker, AMC, Time, Kotaku, TechRepublic, The Atlantic, Crunchyroll, Examiner.com, Bleacher Report, GitHub, Scoop, Moviefone, The Seattle Times, MovieWeb...253 KB (35,092 words) - 08:51, 30 January 2023
- I will be prevented from posting if I allow it to link): http://www.examiner.com/review/earthless-and-joy-bring-a-taste-of-san-diego-psych-rock-to-the-pacific-northwest...249 KB (35,874 words) - 16:42, 28 January 2023
- Frenchman's Tower", San Jose Examiner, San Jose 2. The link is "www.examiner.com/tourism-in-san-jose/the-mystery-of-frenchman-s-tower" 3. I wanted to...252 KB (36,359 words) - 04:40, 4 May 2022
- com/photos/thirdwardhouston/7280234440/ is a color photo http://www.examiner.com/article/the-rev-john-henry-jack-yates-1828-1897 seems to have another...281 KB (39,946 words) - 22:33, 2 March 2023
- Just like it's relevant when used for the blacklisted NowPublic or Examiner.com. In any case, I'm done here. Enjoy your editing. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:17...251 KB (35,207 words) - 08:50, 30 January 2023
- last I remember, PolicyMic is not at all a reliable source, it is like examiner.com , anybody can write for it, no fact-checking. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 03:40...257 KB (33,827 words) - 05:46, 3 March 2023
- religious philosophy. John Carter (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Examiner.com is very plainly not a reliable publisher, and there is truly no reason...257 KB (37,550 words) - 19:17, 20 August 2023
- mentions it three times, but does not go into detail so no help. www.examiner.com/article/steve-taylor-and-jim-morrison-s-grave also doesn't support the...249 KB (34,337 words) - 14:08, 30 May 2022
- until someone challenges their use. Value Walk is probably a bit like Examiner.com has been treated. While something like the NY Times is always a RS, Examiner...247 KB (35,036 words) - 05:44, 3 March 2023
- after AOL bought them ought they turned it into something more like Examiner.com where basically anyone off the street can get a blog on it than the online...256 KB (36,809 words) - 05:47, 3 March 2023
- editors on the basis of inadequate sourcing as the source previously was Examiner.com, a user-submitted bloggy source, whereas Epoch Times is an edited publication...249 KB (34,861 words) - 08:50, 30 January 2023
- inappropriately, it can go straight into the spam blacklist alongside Examiner.com (RSP entry) and Lulu.com (RSP entry). — Newslinger talk 08:35, 2 November...230 KB (32,114 words) - 03:45, 19 November 2019