Talk:Goy/GA1: Difference between revisions
< Talk:Goy
Content deleted Content added
Spinixster (talk | contribs) initial |
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Adding nominator information |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Good article tools}} |
{{Good article tools}} |
||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Goy/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Goy/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Goy/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Goy/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
'''Nominator:''' Atrapalhado |
|||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Spinixster|Spinixster]] ([[User talk:Spinixster|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Spinixster|contribs]]) 02:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Spinixster|Spinixster]] ([[User talk:Spinixster|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Spinixster|contribs]]) 02:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:02, 18 March 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Atrapalhado
Reviewer: Spinixster (talk · contribs) 02:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be reviewing this article based on the Good Article criteria and related guidelines. I am not experienced in this topic, so the full review would take a while, but I will get the basics out of the way first:
- Merge proposal: There is currently a merge proposal on the page. The consensus seems to be a redirect, though, since the other article is already mentioned in this one, so I don't think it will affect this article too much.
- Copyvio: 52.2% similarity, although most of it is common phrases and attributed quotes. It is not a problem, but I'd encourage paraphrasing some parts in order to make the percentage lower.
- Sourcing: needs to be improved. Much of the article relies on questionable sources, such as "biblestudytools.com" and Chabad.org, which per this discussion is only reliable for statements related to the Chabad movement. I think this can easily be replaced with better ones. I'd also encourage using more scholarly sources; Google Scholar and The Wikipedia Library can help.