Talk:AEMT: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jenkstom (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jenkstom (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
If this is supposed to be merged, then why aren't the pages "AEMT-CC" or "Paramedic" merged? [[User:Jenkstom|Jenkstom]] ([[User talk:Jenkstom|talk]]) 18:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
If this is supposed to be merged, then why aren't the pages "AEMT-CC" or "Paramedic" merged? [[User:Jenkstom|Jenkstom]] ([[User talk:Jenkstom|talk]]) 18:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
:AEMT-CC may not meet notability guidelines, AEMT definately does not in its current state. AEMT lacks any references to 3rd party sources and is little more than a dictionary defintion at present.--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
:AEMT-CC may not meet notability guidelines, AEMT definately does not in its current state. AEMT lacks any references to 3rd party sources and is little more than a dictionary defintion at present.--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
::Allowing me fifteen minutes to add references would be helpful. [[User:Jenkstom|Jenkstom]] ([[User talk:Jenkstom|talk]]) 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:37, 14 September 2009

If this is supposed to be merged, then why aren't the pages "AEMT-CC" or "Paramedic" merged? Jenkstom (talk) 18:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AEMT-CC may not meet notability guidelines, AEMT definately does not in its current state. AEMT lacks any references to 3rd party sources and is little more than a dictionary defintion at present.--RadioFan (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Allowing me fifteen minutes to add references would be helpful. Jenkstom (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]