Talk:B.C. Rich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 208.127.80.59 (talk) at 09:26, 22 October 2011 (→‎Horrid crap article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconGuitarists: Equipment Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.


List of Notable Players

That list is ridiculously long, if no one objects, I'll remove all of the ones that aren't formatted "'Name' from 'Band'" and remove all the non-notable players. ≈ Maurauth (Ravenor) 08:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


B.C. Rich guitar quality ranking

Could we add a ranking of the quality of BC Rich guitars? As in some consistent, organized list of all the various levels of B.C. Rich guitars e.g. Bronze, Platinum, Platinum Pro, NJ, NT, Calibre, Custom? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.44.249 (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Horrid crap article

So much info, not even proofread, yet it fails to mention the one ICONIC guitar and when that was invented: the Warlock. Even non-guitarists know that guitar. Your *grandma* probably recognizes it as a guitar that "those crazy angry heavy metal people play". What gives?