Talk:Military career of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:34, 3 August 2011

Military career of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington is currently a War and military good article nominee. Nominated by Ma®©usBritish ^[^talk] at 19:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

Note: Interested in GA criteria-specific review/s rather than 'personal' opinions of historical content.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 8, 2011	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
July 11, 2011	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

Military history: Biography / British / European / Napoleonic era B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Additional information:
/
	This article is currently undergoing an A-Class review.

Note for Editor/GA review

This sentence could do with rewording:

"In cases where the direct lack of his presence is established or unconfirmed, such engagements are not included in his battle record."

Makes it sound like cases where the direct lack of Wellington's presence is unconfirmed aren't counted i.e. times when he definitely was there. Maybe be better to say "Engagments where the direct lack of his presence is established, or where his presence is unconfirmed, are not included in his battle record."? 129.11.76.229 (talk) 10:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. Ma®©usBritish ^[^talk] 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see Wikipedia:Good article criteria.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:26, 3 August 2011 edit MarcusBritish (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 18,077 edits →‎Note for Editor/GA review: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:34, 3 August 2011 edit undo Jim Sweeney (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 102,256 edits not eligible for GA Next edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	:Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. <b>[[User:MarcusBritish\|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">®©</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']] <sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish\|talk]]]</sup></b> 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)		:Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. <b>[[User:MarcusBritish\|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">®©</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']] <sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish\|talk]]]</sup></b> 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
			::As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria]].[[User:Jim Sweeney\|Jim Sweeney]] ([[User talk:Jim Sweeney\|talk]]) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)