Talk:Bloed, Bodem, Eer en Trouw: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:02, 20 September 2006

Griffin is not a neutral source. I am not even sure what the reason is for his comment to be entered here. If you are going make an implication, you have to use a reputable and neutral 3rd party source, otherwise it cannot be entered into Wikipedia. Intangible 15:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin isn't used as a source here. --LucVerhelst 18:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is. That la Libre (incorrectly) reprints his statements, does not make this less a primary source. Intangible 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin's quote isn't used for the information in it, but because of the act of saying that he feels close to the Vlaams Belang. Not the information in his quote is relevant, but the act itself. Surely you can see that.

That's why he isn't used as a source here.--LucVerhelst 20:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All fun and well, but the Vlaams Belang didn't even exist back then. Your above notion makes the quote irrelevant to this article. Either way it is out. Intangible 20:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh ? Back when ? --LucVerhelst 20:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Libre article dates from 8 September 2006...--LucVerhelst 20:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, but you might check the timeline of 2004 as well... Intangible 20:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:V again, will you ? --LucVerhelst 20:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? It is verifiable that the Vlaams Belang did not exist at the time of Griffin's writings. Intangible 21:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We have a verifiable source saying that "un professeur américain, Robert S.Griffin, membre de l'Alliance nationale américaine, qui a participé le samedi 3 juillet 2004, à des activités organisées par «Blood & Honour Vlaanderen», et le BBET («Bloed, Bodem, Eer en Trouw» traduisez «Sang et sol, honneur et fidélité») avait écrit dans le rapport qu'il fit de son voyage qu'il était heureux de voir que les organisations flamandes qu'il a côtoyées en Belgique avaient à leurs côtés un parti comme le Vlaams Belang."

Griffin probably used the words "Vlaams Blok", which was the name of the party in 1994. La Libre Belgique used the present name of the party. You see, everybody in Belgium knows that Vlaams Belang and Vlaams Blok in reality are the same party, it's only legally that there might be a small doubt. But as you know, "the words used in ordinary English usage to describe a subject may be used in Wikipedia",[1] so this argument really is no ground to remove the paragraph.--LucVerhelst 08:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

The article at present is called "Bloed-Bodem-Eer en Trouw". I don't like the hyphens, I think they're not correct, so I'd want to propose a name change. I've seen the group mentioned as "Bloed Bodem Eer en Trouw" and as "Bloed, Bodem, Eer en Trouw". Personally, I would prefer the comma-version, with the other versions as a redirect.

What do you think ? --LucVerhelst 20:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::::::Please check [[WP:V]] again, will you ? --[[User:LucVerhelst|LucVerhelst]] 20:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 ::::::::Huh? It is verifiable that the Vlaams Belang did not exist at the time of Griffin's writings. [[User:Intangible|Intangible]] 21:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
+:::::::::We have a verifiable source saying that "un professeur américain, Robert S.Griffin, membre de l'Alliance nationale américaine, qui a participé le samedi 3 juillet 2004, à des activités organisées par «Blood & Honour Vlaanderen», et le BBET («Bloed, Bodem, Eer en Trouw» traduisez «Sang et sol, honneur et fidélité») avait écrit dans le rapport qu'il fit de son voyage qu'il était heureux de voir que les organisations flamandes qu'il a côtoyées en Belgique avaient à leurs côtés un parti comme le Vlaams Belang."
+:::::::::Griffin probably used the words "Vlaams Blok", which was the name of the party in 1994. La Libre Belgique used the present name of the party. You see, everybody in Belgium knows that Vlaams Belang and Vlaams Blok in reality are the same party, it's only legally that there might be a small doubt. But as you know, "the words used in ordinary English usage to describe a subject may be used in Wikipedia",[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Intangible#Euphemistic_language] so this argument really is no ground to remove the paragraph.--[[User:LucVerhelst|LucVerhelst]] 08:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 == Naming ==