Talk:Bracketing (phenomenology): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 134.84.187.124 - "" |
→definition of "suspending judgment": put aside questions of whether something is "real" |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Philosophy|class=stub|importance=mid|continental=yes|contemporary=yes}} |
{{Philosophy|class=stub|importance=mid|continental=yes|contemporary=yes}} |
||
==definition of "suspending judgment"== |
|||
==Comment Moved from article to talk page== |
|||
I don't understand this article. In particular I need a seriously explicit definition of "suspending judgment" and "phenomenological analysis." Please do not ask me to read more Husserl to find out. This whole process is circular unless I can get a clear idea of what certain basic terms - including "phenomenological reduction" and these others are saying. That is why I came to Wikipedia. -- 76.109.152.93 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/134.84.187.124|134.84.187.124]] ([[User talk:134.84.187.124|talk]]) 15:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I don't understand this article. In particular I need a seriously explicit definition of "suspending judgment" and "phenomenological analysis." Please do not ask me to read more Husserl to find out. This whole process is circular unless I can get a clear idea of what certain basic terms - including "phenomenological reduction" and these others are saying. That is why I came to Wikipedia. -- 76.109.152.93 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/134.84.187.124|134.84.187.124]] ([[User talk:134.84.187.124|talk]]) 15:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
I stumble on this article 1nov11 and find it well-written and intriguing. To suspend judgement is to put aside questions of whether something is "real", to take something at face value; to pretend something is or might be real while you contemplate it directly. This is the same as reading a fiction story or watching a movie; in order to have the full experience, you must pretend it is true, to accept it, for a while.-[[Special:Contributions/96.237.13.111|96.237.13.111]] ([[User talk:96.237.13.111|talk]]) 20:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:59, 1 November 2011
Philosophy: Continental / Contemporary Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
definition of "suspending judgment"
I don't understand this article. In particular I need a seriously explicit definition of "suspending judgment" and "phenomenological analysis." Please do not ask me to read more Husserl to find out. This whole process is circular unless I can get a clear idea of what certain basic terms - including "phenomenological reduction" and these others are saying. That is why I came to Wikipedia. -- 76.109.152.93 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.187.124 (talk) 15:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I stumble on this article 1nov11 and find it well-written and intriguing. To suspend judgement is to put aside questions of whether something is "real", to take something at face value; to pretend something is or might be real while you contemplate it directly. This is the same as reading a fiction story or watching a movie; in order to have the full experience, you must pretend it is true, to accept it, for a while.-96.237.13.111 (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class Continental philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles