Talk:Bricklink

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The Lego Group#BrickLink]] The anchor (#BrickLink) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Lego Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Bricklink, formerly Bricklink LLC and now Lego® Bricklink is a commercial platform with thousands of daily users. While the argument can be made that due to Bricklink as of 2018 being solely child of The Lego Group, it should not have an independent article however as per the agreements of conditions of purchase, Bricklink receives a certain degree of autonomy hence it being still labeled by many as an independent platform.

Hello @EVaDiSh, Wikipedia looks to the notability, verifiability, and contains no original research. However, popularity is not same as notability or verifiability, and a purchased company not always requires to be mentioned or creating an article; if it doesn't meet those criterias. Ahmetlii (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Only one of the sources (bloomberg) is an independent, reliable source. Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1 !11 !! (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect doesn't explain what Bricklink is, however, and is in that regard not particularly helpful. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]