Talk:Eileen Niedfield/GA3: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Adding nominator information |
requesting digital sources |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| picsrelevant = <!-- images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions --> |
| picsrelevant = <!-- images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
===General comments=== |
|||
*Could you provide a digital copy of source #2 please? (I might end up wanting digital copies of all online sources you provided, so be prepared). |
Revision as of 03:22, 22 April 2024
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Fortunaa (talk · contribs) 12:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs) 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I look forward to reviewing this article. Depending on my schedule, a full review might not come until next weekend, but I hope to review this article in bits and pieces over the week. This review will focus on making original research issues and the other MOS details Airship mentioned, as I trust (but will verify) that the other aspects they checked remain up to GA standards. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
General comments
- Could you provide a digital copy of source #2 please? (I might end up wanting digital copies of all online sources you provided, so be prepared).