Talk:French destroyer Fougueux/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Adding nominator information |
→GA Review: review comments |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
If the count used on the GAN page is correct, this will be my 400th GA review. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
If the count used on the GAN page is correct, this will be my 400th GA review. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
* Even if there's no picture available for this ship, would it be good to include a photograph of a ship of the class, so that the reader can at least see the general appearance of that type of vessel? |
|||
* "Fougueux was ordered in April 1927" - infobox has 3 May |
|||
* "The ship was still in Casablanca when Armistice with Germany was signed on 25 June" - wasn't if ''effective'' on 25 June but actually signed earlier? |
|||
* I think a sentence indicating that after the armistice the Vichy French were cooperating with the Germans would be helpful for readers not already familiar with WWII |
|||
* ''Jean Bart'' is linked to a SIA page instead of the correct article |
|||
For the required spot-checks: could you please give the relevant quote(s) from the source for the following statements in the article? |
|||
* "Augusta opened fire at Fougueux at a range of 19,000 yards (17,000 m) at 0843" |
|||
* "On 29 March 1940, the ship's ASDIC set detected a submarine and Fougueux attacked the contact with depth charges, but it was almost certainly a sunken wreck." |
|||
* "The sloop La Gracieuse managed to do so around 1200." |
|||
Revision as of 04:35, 28 April 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
If the count used on the GAN page is correct, this will be my 400th GA review. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Even if there's no picture available for this ship, would it be good to include a photograph of a ship of the class, so that the reader can at least see the general appearance of that type of vessel?
- "Fougueux was ordered in April 1927" - infobox has 3 May
- "The ship was still in Casablanca when Armistice with Germany was signed on 25 June" - wasn't if effective on 25 June but actually signed earlier?
- I think a sentence indicating that after the armistice the Vichy French were cooperating with the Germans would be helpful for readers not already familiar with WWII
- Jean Bart is linked to a SIA page instead of the correct article
For the required spot-checks: could you please give the relevant quote(s) from the source for the following statements in the article?
- "Augusta opened fire at Fougueux at a range of 19,000 yards (17,000 m) at 0843"
- "On 29 March 1940, the ship's ASDIC set detected a submarine and Fougueux attacked the contact with depth charges, but it was almost certainly a sunken wreck."
- "The sloop La Gracieuse managed to do so around 1200."