Talk:Nibiru (hypothetical planet)

How can this article be improved?

This is a growing article. There are many ways it could be improved. For example:

Adding further detail through research
Adding sources
Adding outside links
Adding books or other media in which this or a similar astronomical object appears.

Adding more sources sharing knowledge that is contradicting some of Sitchin's theories
Make sure people know that Sitchin's theories are NOT accepted as proper science by the scientific community in the west (this has nothing to do with my own opinion)
Explain some of the differences between the theories of Sitchin and the western scientific community
Explain more about the language itself, give sources to other translators and translations

These are just a few ideas. Can anyone think of more? Mrwuggs 22:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure how this messaging system works. We'll see. I am Dutch by the way, I will try my very best to use all of my English language skills.

Well, Mrwuggs, I have a few more suggestions. I think it is a good thing the author seems careful about not presenting Sitchin's theories as facts. On the other hand, the author seems very biased as well, presenting almost nothing but Sitchin's theories. I do not have a problem with having an opinion, I give Sitchin credit and believe most of his theories myself. But an author trying to share true information should also shred enough light on the disputable credentials of Sitchin and on the differences between the translations from different sources (researchers, translators and scientists). Writing an article here requires responsibility, as many thousands of people worldwide will get their information from this site. That's why I have not yet written anything here, it would require many hours of research and work and even then my article would still be influenced by my own opinion in the end, biased, in other words. So, the suggestions are added to the ones above.

I am sorry that this messaging system shows one line of text in such an unusual way, I have tried to correct it over and over but nothing seems to do the trick. I have done nothing out of the ordinary, I just typed it like I typed everything else.

It was corrected by removing the unnecessary end of line in the bullet list. 67.180.166.40 02:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the neutrality of this article disputed?

What specifically can be changed to remedy this problem? Mrwuggs 01:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]