Talk:Population exchange between Greek and Turkish Cypriots: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
:Nonsense. It is the WP:COMMONNAME of the invasion. That's what's called by the majority of the reliable sources. ~~~~
Line 13: Line 13:
I will also declare this situation in related Wikipedia board. I will suggest the change of the article name "[[Turkish invasion of Cyprus]]" since there is serious pre-conditioning of Wikipedians there!.[[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming|talk]]) 20:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I will also declare this situation in related Wikipedia board. I will suggest the change of the article name "[[Turkish invasion of Cyprus]]" since there is serious pre-conditioning of Wikipedians there!.[[User:Alexyflemming|Alexyflemming]] ([[User talk:Alexyflemming|talk]]) 20:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


:Nonsense. It is the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] of the invasion. That's what's called by the majority of the reliable sources. [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]]&nbsp;<small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 21:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
:Nonsense. It is the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] of the invasion. That's what's called by the majority of the reliable sources. As far as the invasion being legal that's what multiple socks of {{u|Justice Forever}} kept saying: {{diff|Talk:Northern_Cyprus|prev|398279907}}, {{diff|Northern_Cyprus|497517017|497510685}}. Strange coincidence, isn't it? [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]]&nbsp;<small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 21:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:02, 8 February 2014

Objection

You reverted "the war in 1974" to "the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974". This clearly violates the Wikipedia's neutrality and objectivity principles.

When "the war in 1974" is used, only Turkish Cypriots who uses the phrase "peace operation" may object.
When "the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974" is used, there are many who can object. Notice, there are following PACE and Greece's Athens Court of Appeals decisions. Do you know PACE?

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE): (29.07.1974, Res. 573) "Turkish military intervention was the exercise of a right emanating from an international Treaty and the fulfilment of a legal and moral obligation."

Greece's Athens Court of Appeals (21.03.1979): "The Turkish military intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the Zurich and London Accords, was legal".

Do you want sources? So, when there is a dispute somewhere somehow, Wikipedia must approach very cautiously.

I will also declare this situation in related Wikipedia board. I will suggest the change of the article name "Turkish invasion of Cyprus" since there is serious pre-conditioning of Wikipedians there!.Alexyflemming (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. It is the WP:COMMONNAME of the invasion. That's what's called by the majority of the reliable sources. As far as the invasion being legal that's what multiple socks of Justice Forever kept saying: [1], [2]. Strange coincidence, isn't it? Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 21:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]