From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks . To use this banner, please see the full instructions .Military history Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Template:WikiProject Military history military history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale . This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.
1. M249 is downsized M240 General Purpose Machine gun, not heavy barrelled Assault rifle.
2. Both M249 and RPK uses same ammo as Assault rifles (RPK-74->AK-74, RPK->AK-47 resp. M249->M16)
3. Noticed FN FAL assault rifle is no related with M249, but with M240, what is a FN MAG machine gun licensed and manufactured in USA.
I just saw this
"Therefore, in many modern armies, military doctrine requires the ordinary soldier to avoid using his weapon's fully automatic mode "
Red Army doctrine until the 1980s was for fully automatic fire. Do they not count as modern?