User:Grafikm fr/Arbcom

Disruption history

As the ArbCom is probably aware of, Digwuren has a lengthy record of blocks made by several admins for various disruptions [1]. Since last block, User:Deskana unblocked Digwuren stating explicitely that "having consulted blocking admin, this user is unblocked to participate in RFC and/or mediation cases ONLY. reblock if user abuses this trust."

Obviously, Digwuren's disruptive attitude did not end with that unblock.

Edit warrying and POV Pushing

Digwuren's attitude was extremely disruptive on a number of pages, where he engaged in heavy edit warrying. Examples include:

• Monument of Lihula - edit warrying leading to a block (see block log):
  • [2]
  • [3]

• Anti-Estonian sentiment (now named Estonia-Russia relations). Digwuren again engaged in heavy edit warrying that led to yet another block:
  • [4]
  • [5] - with an offensive edit summary to boot
  • [6]

• Lennart Meri - edit warrying to keep a POV phrase "non-communist style" election. Such a phrase is obviously inflammatory and far better alternatives are possible but he kept reverting it.
  • [7]
  • [8] after another editor tries to NPOV it.

• Jüri Uluots reverting almost the same stuff over and over in an attempt to POV it:
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]

• Soviet occupation - stopping 1 edit short of 3RR:
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]

• Lydia Koidula
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20] edit made 26h after those 3 - how curious...
  • [21] and here we go again

• Rein Lang - edit warrying:
  • [22] removing referenced content
  • [23] and again
  • [24] and again

• Congress of Estonia
  • [25] removing POV tags without consensus
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30] and calling other editor's actions "vandalism" to boot.
  • [31]

Also note heavy edit warrying by User:Alexia Death in the same article.

• Bronze Soldier of Tallinn - here examples are so numerous that I'll only provide a selection of those:
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]

• Soviet occupation of Romania - removing POV tag without consensus:
  • [36] - calling others' edits "vandalism" again
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]

There are many more diffs from this page but they're too many to list them all

• Einsatzgruppe A
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]

Basically, what he's trying to do is to bully other editors to make them stay out of "his" articles so he can plague them with POV pushing. These edits are only a sample (albeit a representative one) of his warrying.

Sander Sade

Calling other user's edits "vandalism":

• [48]