User:IloveUveryMuch: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Userbox | border-c = #999 | border-s = 1 | id-c = | id-s = 10 | id-fc = black | info-c = #EEE | info-s = 8 | info-fc = black | id = default SE | info = This User set his default search engine to Wikipedia. | float = middle }}
{{Userbox | border-c = #999 | border-s = 1 | id-c = | id-s = 10 | id-fc = black | info-c = #EEE | info-s = 8 | info-fc = black | id = default SE | info = This User set his default search engine to Wikipedia. | float = middle }}
{{Userbox|border-c=#999|border-s=1|id-c=|id-s=10|id-fc=#000|info-c=#eee|info-s=8|info-fc=#000|id=1000h+|info=This [[User:IloveUveryMuch|User]] have the will to do WP for 1000 hours.}}
{{Userbox|border-c=#999|border-s=1|id-c=|id-s=10|id-fc=#000|info-c=#eee|info-s=8|info-fc=#000|id=1000h+|info=This [[User:IloveUveryMuch|User]] have the will to do WP for 1000 hours.}}
{{age in days|30 Janurary 2022}}
{{age in days|30 Jan 2022}}
{{User WikiProject Sex}}
{{User WikiProject Sex}}
{{Userboxbottom}}
{{Userboxbottom}}

Revision as of 02:20, 12 May 2022

This User had read a lot of WP:PG :-(, in fact he had read for 2 weeks. :-(

Reference best practices

This practice is facultative neither is it a policy nor a guideline of Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects.

Scope

This user page gives my reference best practices that I frequently use. It ONLY discusses the process of selecting sources.

Audience

It MAY intended to anyone who is interested in citing better, and those who are wikiholic. Or who spend 500 hours of their lives on Wikipedia.

Prerequisite

There is only one prerequisite: The will of finding references for a very very loooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnggggg time (WARNING: I did that for around 200 hours).

Benefits of reading this page

It SHOULD make u more a reliable editor, as referencing is a HUGGE Part of WP.

WHy DiD i wRiTE diz?

I found that after reading WP:CS, it was disguistingly long. And many WP articles cites disguisting sources. :(

They should replace that with this simple phrase: "All that we care is the information, how did it (the source) get that information (i.e. origin)? what can influence the contents (i.e. influence)?" as simple as that.

Another is: Thou shalt find "all" primary sources even if its exhaustive.

Willfull violation

§WHy Did i wRiTE diz? is a willfull violation of MOS:HEAD sentence case rule.

Discourse format

Quid novi?

I am now learning intellectual property.