User:Jéské Couriano/ArbEnfCount/ArchiveGroups/290s

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jéské Couriano (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 25 April 2024 (Fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Legend
Blk TBan Warn NEA Decl Acpt PLS Misc NV PE STL WD NOR
Block Topic-ban Warning Non-enforcement Declined appeal Accepted appeal Page-level sanction Misc. Moot/not a violation Procedural error Inconclusive Withdrawn Other decline reason
Archive no. Sanctions total Thread Arb case Date of last post Sanctions applied Summary Notes
291 3 topic-bans
2 non-enforcement actions
CutePeach COVID Aug. 03, 2021 CutePeach: Ban from origins of COVID-19 topic area (indef) TBan Admins also noted the ban could be expanded to a blanket COVID area one if issues arose in other COVID-related areas.
Santamoly EE Aug. 03, 2021 Santamoly: Block (indef, non-enforcement) NEA It was noted Santamoly immediately breached their ban after their last block for violating it, and that their edit history showed no intent of adhering to the ban.
BengHistory IP Aug. 09, 2021 BengHistory: Ban from GS/CASTE area (indef) TBan N/A
অভিরূপ দাশশর্মা[i] IP Aug. 11, 2021 অভিরূপ দাশশর্মা: Block (indef, non-enforcement) NEA N/A
Manish9893 IP Aug. 11, 2021 Manish9893: Ban from IP area (indef) TBan N/A
292 3 blocks
2 topic-bans
1 warning
2 delcined appeals
2 moot/not violations
1 withdrawn
1 not acted on for other reasons
Loveall.human IP Aug. 15, 2021 Loveall.human: Warned to be more cautious with sourcing Warn Harder sanctions were rejected after Black Kite commented that the filer had a history of weaponising administrative boards to remove ideological opponents and that Loveall.human's behaviour wasn't any better or worse than that of other IP area editors.
Shakespeare143 IP Aug. 16, 2021 Shakespeare143: Ban from IP area (indef) TBan N/A
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Azuresky Voight BLP Aug. 17, 2021 Azuresky Voight: Ban from BLP area remains in place, 6mo block overtaken by events. Decl Subject would be indefinitely blocked independent of the thread for attempting to dox another editor.
Number 57 PIA4 Aug. 18, 2021 -nil- NOR Administrators noted the filer was a participant in the edit-war at the locus of the thread, and forcibly shut it down with informal warnings to both filer and subject.
Plebian-scribe AP2 Aug. 21, 2021 Plebian-scribe: Block (1w) Blk N/A
Olden Creed IP Aug. 21, 2021 Olden Creed: Block (1w) Blk Olden Creed would be blocked a month later due to constant breaches of the ban and apparent inability to communicate.
Hugo.arg and Kazimier Lachnovič EE Aug. 23, 2021 -nil- NV Largely dismissed as a broader content dispute, with discussion on the users moving to sockpuppet investigations.
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by TillermanJimW GS Aug. 27, 2021 TillermanJimW: Block remains in place. Decl One admin characterised the appeal as "a rant", and the appeal itself was seen as clueless about Wikipedia.
Solavirum AA2 Aug. 27, 2021 Solavirum: Voluntary topic-ban from Ottoman, Iranian, Turkish, Persian, Georgian, Caucasus, and Caspian topics (indef) TBan Solavirum was warned in no uncertain terms breaching this topic-ban would almost certainly lead to an indefinite block.
GoodDay ATC Aug. 27, 2021 -nil- WD Withdrawn by filer after administrators found no reason to sanction GoodDay (with two of them essentially deeming the thread frivolous).
Vanlister PIA4 Aug. 31, 2021 -nil- NV Edits and reverts in question either predated PIA4 or were in compliance with the spirit, if not the letter of 1RR.
Davidbena PIA4 Sep. 03, 2021 Davidbena: Block (63d) Blk Block was stated as being one month and five weeks in length, the month for the thread and the additional five weeks for other, related matters. (The reason the block is 63 days and not 65 is because that is how long the blocking admin explicitly set it for.)

Footnotes

  1. ^ bn: Abhirup Dasharma