User:Midgeholland/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DayziahN (talk | contribs)
DayziahN (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
* 1 Great job on detail! mostly grammatical edits. Also added more links. Other vague discrepancies are noted in this user's talk page [[User:Samafo|Samafo]] ([[User talk:Samafo|talk]]) 08:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
* 1 Great job on detail! mostly grammatical edits. Also added more links. Other vague discrepancies are noted in this user's talk page [[User:Samafo|Samafo]] ([[User talk:Samafo|talk]]) 08:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
* 2 I don't know if this is the appropriate place to put down my review or critique of your prezi presentation? Anyways, I looked over the prezi and wow, do you guys have everything ready to go. I can tell that the group members have been working really hard, and the research or wiki project has been taken above and beyond, very well done you guys!
* 2 I don't know if this is the appropriate place to put down my review or critique of your prezi presentation? Anyways, I looked over the prezi and wow, do you guys have everything ready to go. I can tell that the group members have been working really hard, and the research or wiki project has been taken above and beyond, very well done you guys!
* 3 Really great job on the research done for you guys' topic. It's not hard to tell that you guys each put in a lot of effort and didn't throw it together over night. I found it really interesting that instead of adding to the page women in science you created an entirely different page and really put the information needed to keep it up on the site. You guys did a very good job!
* 3 Really great job on the research done for you guys' topic. It's not hard to tell that you guys each put in a lot of effort and didn't throw it together over night. I found it really interesting that instead of adding to the page women in science you created an entirely different page and really put the information needed to keep it up on the site. You guys did a very good job on formatting the pages you created like a typical Wikipedia page. You hit all of the aspects of the project including both the group and individual work. Great Job!
* 4
* 4
* 5
* 5

Revision as of 10:40, 5 December 2013

To See A Clean Journal Of Project

  • Users:TaviWright, Midgeholland, Lhanlon

click this link https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Uj7_mWQ9cc5r0nmXalfpQ2HMhBFJc1pAGn6VyWdmKo/edit?usp=sharing

If you are NOT from our group, feel free to write peer reviews in this section! If you've got reviews, we want em!

  • 1 Great job on detail! mostly grammatical edits. Also added more links. Other vague discrepancies are noted in this user's talk page Samafo (talk) 08:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
  • 2 I don't know if this is the appropriate place to put down my review or critique of your prezi presentation? Anyways, I looked over the prezi and wow, do you guys have everything ready to go. I can tell that the group members have been working really hard, and the research or wiki project has been taken above and beyond, very well done you guys!
  • 3 Really great job on the research done for you guys' topic. It's not hard to tell that you guys each put in a lot of effort and didn't throw it together over night. I found it really interesting that instead of adding to the page women in science you created an entirely different page and really put the information needed to keep it up on the site. You guys did a very good job on formatting the pages you created like a typical Wikipedia page. You hit all of the aspects of the project including both the group and individual work. Great Job!
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

We have completed the following:

  • (11/21 | 10:00a) Created page for H. J. Mozans (Link to the page itself without redirect here: [[1]]
  • (11/21 | 10:15a) Redirected the page for H. J. Mozans to John Augustine Zahm
  • (11/21 | 10:30a) Added "pseudonym H. J. Mozans" at the top of the page for John Augustine Zahm
  • (11/21 | 11:00a) Put links in the page for Sophie Germain so the references to H. J. Mozans now have a link (to the redirected page John Augustine Zahm)
  • (11/21 | 10:45a) Changed wording on Sophie Germain's page:
  • Old: "H. J. Mozans, whose biography of Germain "is inaccurate and the notes and bibliography are unreliable",[66] but is nevertheless interesting, quotes the mathematician Claude-Louis Navier as saying, "it is a work which few men are able to read and which only one woman was able to write."[67]" to
  • New: "Germain was also included in H. J. Mozans' book "Woman in Science",[66] although Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie claims that the biography "is inaccurate and the notes and bibliography are unreliable".[67] Nevertheless, it quotes the mathematician Claude-Louis Navier as saying, "it is a work which few men are able to read and which only one woman was able to write."[68]"
  • (11/21 | 12:30p) Added the page Woman in Science, and linked where appropriate.
  • (11/21 | 12:45p) Edited in JAZ and WIS to add "not to be confused with the phrase 'women in science'"
  • (11/24 | 11:28a) Edited Woman and Science book page. Added list of chapters, and a couple of themes explained in the preface, added a link to the book online as reference, added a list of woman by chapters mentioned
  • (11/25 | 7:51p) Formatted and structured Woman in Science. Added references.
  • (11/25 | 8:23p) Added infobox to John Augustine Zahm.
  • (11/26 | 9:40a) Added links to the Women in Science book page
  • (11/26 | 10:33a) Edited the Father Zahm page radically. Added subtitles, headlines added extra details, facts of life, written works, lectures, career in church and Dr. of Philosophy, Vice President of Notre Dame, aded references and hyperlinks to works and magazines, restructured information, spoke of Woman and Science and Great Inspirers as defiance of beliefs of that day.
  • (12/02 | 11:50a) Added several references to the Father Zahm page.
  • Finished nearly all parts of MS word doc:
  • 500 words , Copy all citations, Presentation, Peer review

TO DO

  • Go here:
  • Need TO ADD MORE to the two groups I peer edited to add onto to Doc and WE ARE FINISHED

PRESENTATIONS

FINISHED ON DOC Michaela

  • http://www.prezi.com/qrzsm80lx4um/
  • here is what I am presenting for my presentation, let me know what you think, There will be talking and exploration of the pages and links to show the history

Laura

  • looks great! If you have link just put here

Tavi

PEER EDITS OUR GROUP HAS DONE

Dec. 1st, 2013 9:12pm In Side Effects section: There are also rare instances of stroke and heart attack. Some people experience pain and infection at the area where Norplant was inserted.

  • peer review: Michaela Holland. Hi I checked your Norplant page and your addiyions are still up there! YAY. I think you should 1. Hyperlink the words stroke and heart attack just put two brackets arond it like this stroke heart attack or just click the chain looking button on the top left of the edit bar

You also seem a little low on things to add to Wikipedia, maybe talk about the complications of removal, the finances, insurance policy, and doctor's not being trained in removal. 3. Last just hperlink your reference on the page concerning Dorthy Robert's article we read in class. I am sure you can find it on J stor and hyperlink it externally through the button I mentioned before! Great job https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cynst76/sandbox

peer edit: Michaela Holland

  • Hi nice job on changing the heading. there are alot of ideas and section that can continue to be updated. First each of these books lack hyperlinks which are made by two brackets for words such as metaphor and sperm and egg these links help to concrete your facts by sedning the reader to their wiki page or another online site that explains your word deeper, its a great easy wa to reference material.
  • go in depth eg: Woman in Body Emily Martin ses field work.. what kind of field work? From when in her life?
  • in Labor speak of the different economic uterian and laissez faire and talk about how she drew on the historical aspect on these for the shift in culture
  • hyperlink your references at the bottom so people can easily check your work and check the book you are speaking of connected to Emily Martin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SaraForeman/sandbox