User:Mindjuicer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:38, 26 February 2012

Wikipedia is heavily biased towards petty zealotry. Zealots who spend the most time driving away competing editors, threatening them on their user pages, instareverting edits, recruiting other zealots and studying the arcane WP guideline structure & misrepresenting it... win.

It's not enough to have an NPOV viewpoint and fit in with WP policy. It's not even enough to be able to spend a lot of time justifying your edits. You also need to have enough people agreeing with you to get the zealots to back down. Mindjuicer (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Addendum: I have proven that it is possible, with 1 or 2 other NPOV editors to move an article in that direction. But having been banned from such topics on the basis of 4 of the zealots' opinions, three of whom are probably socks, I have also proven you may not survive the process. ;) --Mindjuicer (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:37, 26 February 2012 edit Mindjuicer (talk \| contribs) 321 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:38, 26 February 2012 edit undo Mindjuicer (talk \| contribs) 321 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It's not enough to have an NPOV viewpoint and fit in with WP policy. It's not even enough to be able to spend a lot of time justifying your edits. You also need to have enough people agreeing with you to get the zealots to back down. [[User:Mindjuicer\|Mindjuicer]] ([[User talk:Mindjuicer\|talk]]) 17:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)		It's not enough to have an NPOV viewpoint and fit in with WP policy. It's not even enough to be able to spend a lot of time justifying your edits. You also need to have enough people agreeing with you to get the zealots to back down. [[User:Mindjuicer\|Mindjuicer]] ([[User talk:Mindjuicer\|talk]]) 17:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

	Addendum: I have proven that it is possible, with 1 or 2 other NPOV editors to move an article in that direction. But having been banned from ~~those~~ topics on the basis of 4 of the zealots opinions, three of whom are probably socks, I have also proven you may not survive the process. ;) --[[User:Mindjuicer\|Mindjuicer]] ([[User talk:Mindjuicer\|talk]]) 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)		Addendum: I have proven that it is possible, with 1 or 2 other NPOV editors to move an article in that direction. But having been banned from such topics on the basis of 4 of the zealots' opinions, three of whom are probably socks, I have also proven you may not survive the process. ;) --[[User:Mindjuicer\|Mindjuicer]] ([[User talk:Mindjuicer\|talk]]) 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)