User talk:AuburnPilot: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:11, 10 July 2009

AuburnPilot (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions)

If page protection prevents you from leaving a comment below, please use User talk:AuburnPilot/unprotected.

I do not now, nor have I ever, used the name AuburnPilot for any purposes other than those related to my work on Wikipedia.

Archive 1 · Archive 2 · Archive 3 · Archive 4 · Archive 5 · Archive 6 Comments are automatically archived after 3 days by MiszaBot III.

Admin statistics
Action	Count
Edits	25126
Edits+Deleted	28411
Pages deleted	3313
Revisions deleted	7
Pages restored	248
Pages protected	537
Pages unprotected	70
Protections modified	55
Users blocked	1223
Users reblocked	30
Users unblocked	145
User rights modified	20
Users created	6

Rollback tool

You gave my former account the rollback tool back in January 2008. I was erroneously blocked as explained here in May 2008. I am requesting for this account to be given the rollback tool so that I can revert vandalism more efficiently, especially in light of the creation of the WikiProject United States presidential elections Watchlist. Thank you. --William S. Saturn (talk) 17:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I remember you under your former username and am glad to see everything was straightened out. --auburnpilot talk 00:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --William S. Saturn (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't moderate others' userpages for vandalism.

This is pretty old, but I just noticed it, because I never look at the history page of my userpage.

A long time ago, you reverted some vandalism on my userpage here. [1]

Please don't do that again or to other people. Even if it's mischievous, if the person doesn't like it, the user themselves can simply remove it. I don't want to miss out on seeing something amusing because somebody removed vandalism from my userpage without telling me. Why even assume it's vandalism too? Maybe I want crazy anti-Wikipedia zealots trollin' up my userpages!! ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zenwhat, please find some other way to amuse yourself without involving me. Are you actually coming here to complain that I reverted vandalism on your userpage more than 4 months ago? Seriously? Things never change... --auburnpilot talk 04:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not you, specifically. Somebody else did the same thing and I sent him the same message. A problem should be rectified, regardless of the time-frame in which the problem occurred.

Also, things do change. I stay out of trouble on Wikipedia nowadays because I don't edit as often (it's boring, honestly, and I actually have a life) and don't worry at all about what other people doing, and I don't waste time getting into lengthy debates. ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 05:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promethean on the warpath again

You may wish to weigh in on this discussion, if you have a Meta account. Cheers! -- Thekohser 14:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 ::Also, things do change. I stay out of trouble on Wikipedia nowadays because I don't edit as often (it's boring, honestly, and I actually have a life) and don't worry at all about what other people doing, and I don't waste time getting into lengthy debates. <font size="4">[[Zen|&#9775;]]</font>&nbsp;<font face="impact">&nbsp;[[User:Zenwhat|Zenwhat]]</font>&nbsp;([[User talk:Zenwhat|talk]]) 05:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
+== Promethean on the warpath again ==
+You may wish to weigh in on [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat#Request_for_discussion_--_User:Promethean this discussion], if you have a Meta account. Cheers! -- [[User:Thekohser|Thekohser]] 14:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)