User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions
Magnolia677 (talk | contribs) →Unsourced edits: new section |
Sagecandor (talk | contribs) →Concerns: add |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Most of my edits are to small towns in the southern US, adding photos and cleaning up articles, but a while back I created the article [[Kodak Black]], which necessarily led me into editing articles about rap musicians (Kodak Black gets an astounding 8,732 views daily). Unfortunately, nearly all of my edits to those music articles involve reverting vandalism or removing unsourced content. I think it's a younger group of editors who work on the rap articles, and although most are very hard working and are excited to improve the articles, some editors appear particularly oppositional to adding sources to their edits (to an extent far greater than on an article about a hamlet in Mississippi). Occasionally, some editors simply refuse to properly source their edits, and the cleanup is extensive. Would you have a moment to look at my comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JayPe&diff=prev&oldid=754228031 here]? You've been helpful with this in the past, and I'm always reluctant to go to ANI. Thank you. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677|talk]]) 15:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
Most of my edits are to small towns in the southern US, adding photos and cleaning up articles, but a while back I created the article [[Kodak Black]], which necessarily led me into editing articles about rap musicians (Kodak Black gets an astounding 8,732 views daily). Unfortunately, nearly all of my edits to those music articles involve reverting vandalism or removing unsourced content. I think it's a younger group of editors who work on the rap articles, and although most are very hard working and are excited to improve the articles, some editors appear particularly oppositional to adding sources to their edits (to an extent far greater than on an article about a hamlet in Mississippi). Occasionally, some editors simply refuse to properly source their edits, and the cleanup is extensive. Would you have a moment to look at my comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JayPe&diff=prev&oldid=754228031 here]? You've been helpful with this in the past, and I'm always reluctant to go to ANI. Thank you. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677|talk]]) 15:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Concerns == |
|||
*Concerns about [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fake_news_website&diff=754257641&oldid=754255429 misrepresenting sources to remove "far-right"], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=754259831&oldid=754257065 adding bizarre image to the article], and personal attacks and violations of [[WP:NOTFORUM]] with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fake_news_website&diff=754234739&oldid=754232624 this]. |
|||
*Bizarre irrelevant image now added across two articles [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=754259831&oldid=754257065] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PropOrNot&diff=754212547&oldid=754211363] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PropOrNot&diff=754264422&oldid=754264151]. |
|||
*Violating [[WP:NPOV]] with change of section title [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PropOrNot&diff=754210038&oldid=754209463]. |
|||
What's the next best step here? Would it be a warning prior to AE in the form of a discretionary notification ? [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 19:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive934#User:Snooganssnoogans] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:SashiRolls] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:B%27rer_Frog]. [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 19:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:17, 11 December 2016
 | For Talk Page Archives, click here. |
| “You’re obliged to pretend respect for people and institutions you think absurd. You live attached in a cowardly fashion to moral and social conventions you despise, condemn, and know lack of all foundation." Octave Mirbeau |
| I am mostly retired; I do occasionally pop up when I think that someone's not doing something properly. Or I'm just having one of those days. You get the general idea. |
Userpage
Did you mean to create a redirect to this talkpage? Right now, the page redirects to itself. :) Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Doh! Thanks Brad. Black Kite (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Admin board
I am not sure we share the same definition of uncivility. Polentarion Talk 16:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly not. But then life would be boring if we all thought in the same way. Black Kite (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Let me say I sort of annoyed about the way the complaint was being dealt with. "Lying like crazy" or "brown nosing" is way beyond anything in WP:CIVIL. Is that sort of discourse regarded as being normal in the meanwhile? If that is your preferred sort of entertainment, I opt for being bored. Polentarion Talk 18:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced edits
Most of my edits are to small towns in the southern US, adding photos and cleaning up articles, but a while back I created the article Kodak Black, which necessarily led me into editing articles about rap musicians (Kodak Black gets an astounding 8,732 views daily). Unfortunately, nearly all of my edits to those music articles involve reverting vandalism or removing unsourced content. I think it's a younger group of editors who work on the rap articles, and although most are very hard working and are excited to improve the articles, some editors appear particularly oppositional to adding sources to their edits (to an extent far greater than on an article about a hamlet in Mississippi). Occasionally, some editors simply refuse to properly source their edits, and the cleanup is extensive. Would you have a moment to look at my comment here? You've been helpful with this in the past, and I'm always reluctant to go to ANI. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Concerns
- Concerns about misrepresenting sources to remove "far-right", adding bizarre image to the article, and personal attacks and violations of WP:NOTFORUM with this.
- Bizarre irrelevant image now added across two articles [1] [2] [3].
- Violating WP:NPOV with change of section title [4].
What's the next best step here? Would it be a warning prior to AE in the form of a discretionary notification ? Sagecandor (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Previously [5] and [6] and [7]. Sagecandor (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)