User talk:Demostene

Ypoem

A tag has been placed on Ypoem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Ypoem. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete the speedy deletion tag from the page. If you want to even think its got a chance of being kept I suggest you sort out the picture link RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Final warning, remove the speedy deletion tag again and you will be reported and blocked from editing RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Since your final warning you have removed the speedy deletion tag twice - stop it, you have already been reported RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

My familiarity with wikipedia is new, I am not aware of how it works and I do not understand very well the edit tags and procedure. The argument for the word itself stands as a concept and should not be removed. If links are not allowed under the ground of private content then they should be removed. Ypoem is a new form of art and its description as means of expression and timline should remain. Since its meaning has allready been determined prior, I do not see an objection of it being in the wikipedia encyclopedia.

As using the wiki guidelines the links to websites have been removed, even if it is a source of history for the concept and what it stand for. Such being done, the term as a concept stand aside, being explained for what it is, just a new form of poetry using visual virtual elements. I quote from wiki so that can be seen that the linkes have been removed and therefore it is not a means of advertising or a link to any personal material from the net, leaving just the term itself, its description and an example. The wiki quote that has been resolved: "This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location.

The article has been reviewed now and deleted by an administrator. DO NOT create it. The subject is not notable enough as explained in the talk page of the article RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

You already have recreated it and I am now going to request it is deleted again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The means for its deletion have been supressed as proved above, quoting wiki guidelines. Personal links have been removed and an explanation provided

Since wikipedia is an encyclopedia and it stand on scientific grounds, before removing the term and explanation of the concept as "not notable" please allow me the time to provide a scientific advocacy and research, proving it's form by showing examples of other such forms of art in the wiki archive. thank you

• Ive given you 5 days, going to bed now. I will try and give you some help with it tomorrow so leave a message on my talk page if you get stuck, it needs a far greater explanation of what it is if it isn't going to get deleted RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)