User talk:Freestylefrappe: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Your comment about my vote |
removing all comments-too stupid for me to archive |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# involvement in private conversations - dont jump in if you aren't involved in the article or topic in question, start a new section |
# involvement in private conversations - dont jump in if you aren't involved in the article or topic in question, start a new section |
||
# personal attacks towards any user |
# personal attacks towards any user |
||
==Personal== |
|||
I was just wondering, did I say something to make you mad or something I did that made you mad? I was wondering if you had something personal against me? [[User:SWD316|SWD316]] 02:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Kumanovo]] protection== |
|||
(cross-posting to [[Talk:Kumanovo]]) Freestylefrappe, you should '''never''' unprotect a page in which you are involved in a content dispute and then proceed to edit the page. Even if you thought the protection was unnecessary, you still shouldn't unprotect - ask the protecting admin (me, in this case) or another admin to unprotect. You unprotected this page with the edit summary "Not needed" after I had protected it and then edited the page several times. Your above post (on the article's talk page) also indicates that you thought protection was not necessary, yet you have not answered to my response yet. Even if the unprotect and then editing is justified, an involved editor should never do this because it creates the perception of misusing your administrative tools. In the future, please '''do not''' unprotect and then edit an article in which you are involved. Thank you. [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 17:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:If the dispute was solved off-Wikipedia, that's great. No, I'm not taking this personally - instead, I'm just letting you know it's never correct to unprotect and edit something you are/were in a dispute with. If you solved the problem off the project, say so on the talk page. Thanks! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 18:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
::Flcelloguy is absolutely correct. You should ''never'' use Administrative powers in dealing with a content dispute. Your role as editor and as Administrator should be completely seperate. You do not seem to understand this well whatsoever, and that disturbs me greatly. [[User:Evilphoenix|Ëvilphoenix]] <sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Evilphoenix|Burn!]]</b></small></sup> 18:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lifeisunfair]]== |
|||
Do I understand your vote correctly? You oppose my candidacy because of my username (a song/sitcom reference)? —[[User:Lifeisunfair|Lifeisunfair]] 02:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Your comment about my vote == |
|||
You seem to have voted and commented on my vote at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Izehar]] after the relevant discussion was moved to the [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Izehar|talk page]]. In that case, you may have missed the discussion which led me to changing my vote. I have since asked Izehar to reverse that move. |
|||
OTOH, if you had already read that before voting, or still agree with your comment after reading it, I would ask you to provide any evidence whatsoever that (a) I have any other reason for opposing Izehar's adminship than the ones I stated in my vote(s), (b) I have any reason to "have it in for this user" and/or (c) that I have ever trolled on Wikipedia (or anywhere else for that matter). |
|||
Regards, [[User:Zocky|Zocky]] 16:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:58, 22 December 2005
- DO NOT THANK ME for an RFA I voted on
- DO NOT ENGAGE IN THE FOLLOWING...
- cruel and unusual punishment
- involvement in private conversations - dont jump in if you aren't involved in the article or topic in question, start a new section
- personal attacks towards any user