User talk:173.69.157.86: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Married to wikipedia instead of a woman at 52. Shame.
Line 1: Line 1:
==January 2019==
==January 2019==
Please stop adding "''X'' single pushed to radio" to Chainsmokers articles. It has no significance and Wikipedia does not consider radio singles to be more superior. Regardless of whether the song has been pushed to radio, it is still a single as long as a source calls it one. There is no need to denote which one was sent to radio. Please stop adding such trivial information. [[User:Hayman30|Hayman30]] ([[User talk:Hayman30|talk]]) 04:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding "''X'' single pushed to radio" to Chainsmokers articles. It has no significance and Wikipedia does not consider radio singles to be more superior. Regardless of whether the song has been pushed to radio, it is still a single as long as a source calls it one. There is no need to denote which one was sent to radio. Please stop adding such trivial information. [[User:Hayman30|Hayman30]] ([[User talk:Hayman30|talk]]) 04:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
:{{Re|Ad Orientem}} This account appears to be active again and has been making disruptive changes. Perhaps give him a block? [[User:Hayman30|Hayman30]] ([[User talk:Hayman30|talk]]) 04:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
::Wasn't aware adding radio release history was disruptive. It's almost like you're throwing a tizzy because you disagree with another editor.
::Wasn't aware adding radio release history was disruptive. It's almost like you're throwing a tizzy because you disagree with another editor.

Revision as of 05:09, 10 January 2019

January 2019

Please stop adding "X single pushed to radio" to Chainsmokers articles. It has no significance and Wikipedia does not consider radio singles to be more superior. Regardless of whether the song has been pushed to radio, it is still a single as long as a source calls it one. There is no need to denote which one was sent to radio. Please stop adding such trivial information. Hayman30 (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't aware adding radio release history was disruptive. It's almost like you're throwing a tizzy because you disagree with another editor.