User talk:AJB43: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I didn't get that ping, probably because you didn't sign your statement. Anyway, it is not me but the [[WP:Arbitration Committee]] that says you are not allowed to edit the article or its talk page. If you persist I will have you blocked. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 06:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
: I didn't get that ping, probably because you didn't sign your statement. Anyway, it is not me but the [[WP:Arbitration Committee]] that says you are not allowed to edit the article or its talk page. If you persist I will have you blocked. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 06:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
Zero0000, I read the link. There is no reason why I cannot edit, for this has nothing to do with any conflict, and this cannot be reasonably assumed. This has to do with pedantry. This is an encyclopedia, using precise terms is key. |
|||
Pedantry would have it that by all definitions, what needs to be listed as a successor area to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration should be the "Palestinian National Authority," not the "State of Palestine." |
|||
Again, nothing to do with conflicts, but accurate definitions. |
|||
{{ping|Zero0000}}. |
|||
[[User:AJB43|AJB43]] ([[User talk:AJB43#top|talk]]) 06:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)AJB43 |
|||
Revision as of 06:50, 31 January 2016
Zero0000, you cannot just post a link to something twice, and not cite the relevant articles that would expressly state that I am not allowed to edit or contribute to the specific topic. Furthermore, telling me to go away is irrelevant. You clearly are not in the loop.
@Zero0000:.
- I didn't get that ping, probably because you didn't sign your statement. Anyway, it is not me but the WP:Arbitration Committee that says you are not allowed to edit the article or its talk page. If you persist I will have you blocked. Zerotalk 06:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Zero0000, I read the link. There is no reason why I cannot edit, for this has nothing to do with any conflict, and this cannot be reasonably assumed. This has to do with pedantry. This is an encyclopedia, using precise terms is key.
Pedantry would have it that by all definitions, what needs to be listed as a successor area to the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration should be the "Palestinian National Authority," not the "State of Palestine."
Again, nothing to do with conflicts, but accurate definitions.
@Zero0000:.