User talk:AdamBerg: Difference between revisions
→Policy: new section |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
You are not permitted to editorialize, and state your personal opinions in an article. Please refrain from doing so, and, if you wish to contribute productively to wikipedia, make some proposals, with documentation preferably, on the relevant talk pages. Thank you [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 20:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC) |
You are not permitted to editorialize, and state your personal opinions in an article. Please refrain from doing so, and, if you wish to contribute productively to wikipedia, make some proposals, with documentation preferably, on the relevant talk pages. Thank you [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 20:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Your personal opinion is that Will Shaksper of Stratford wrote the plays. Most people have a personal opinion about who wrote the plays. Any opinion anyone has is personal. The article on Edward de Vere is written to discredit the idea that he was the author of these plays. No neutral point of view is used to discuss the overwhelming cirumstantial evidence that he was the true author. No discussion of the many writers and scholars who have written in favor of de Vere is allowed. In addition, the Shakespeare authorship page is slanted the same way. People should know that serious, convincing work has been done in the field and that many learned people believe de Vere was the author. It doesn't matter what article or what page this controversy appears on, the narrative is not written objectively. It is written with a very heavy bias against de Vere. I'm not ediorializing when I say de Vere wrote these plays. That's what evidence suggests. |
|||
Revision as of 04:40, 4 March 2011
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.
This is just a quick note to let you know that coverage of the topic you have recently been editing (Shakespeare Authorship) has been a source of contention.
In particular, you should be aware that the was recently a case held by Wikipedia's final dispute resolution body, the Arbitration Committee (link here) and that because of some disruptive editing in this area, wide discretion was given to administrators to ensure the editors and articles remained within Wikipedia's guidelines.
Please be mindful of our policies on neutrality, verifiability and repeated reverting.
CIreland (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Policy
You are not permitted to editorialize, and state your personal opinions in an article. Please refrain from doing so, and, if you wish to contribute productively to wikipedia, make some proposals, with documentation preferably, on the relevant talk pages. Thank you Nishidani (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Your personal opinion is that Will Shaksper of Stratford wrote the plays. Most people have a personal opinion about who wrote the plays. Any opinion anyone has is personal. The article on Edward de Vere is written to discredit the idea that he was the author of these plays. No neutral point of view is used to discuss the overwhelming cirumstantial evidence that he was the true author. No discussion of the many writers and scholars who have written in favor of de Vere is allowed. In addition, the Shakespeare authorship page is slanted the same way. People should know that serious, convincing work has been done in the field and that many learned people believe de Vere was the author. It doesn't matter what article or what page this controversy appears on, the narrative is not written objectively. It is written with a very heavy bias against de Vere. I'm not ediorializing when I say de Vere wrote these plays. That's what evidence suggests.