User talk:Aktsu

Re: Goldberg

I can't really see anything wrong with those edits, except for the fact that the references are hard to verify because Template:Cite episode is used, although, obviously, that is acceptable. The "do not change the order of these moves" is just there becasue ips tend to change the moves out of alphabetical order, which is how they should be organised. As far as I can see, the ip has added the new moves in alphabetical order, so that's not a problem. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 10:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, actually interestingly enough this was brought up at WP:PW's talk page by a different user, see WT:PW#Cite Episode? and consensus there seems to be that cite episode shouldn't be used for move lists as it's interpretation by the viewer on what the move actually is, and therefore OR. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:65.220.13.2

Input here please. What can/should be done with this IP? It has received no less than 9 warnings this month for nonconstructive editing practices. And you can see the prior history as well. Do you generally report this sort of thing on ANI after final warning? Thanks. --Drr-darkomen (talk) 22:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. Always looking for guidelines on how to be most effective in these situations. Most things that I run in to aren't strictly vandalism. I would say 90% is unsourced changes. --Drr-darkomen (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

The section stays? Who does this guy think he is? Talk about not working well with others and not listening to rational arguments... --Drr-darkomen (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Let's revisit the situation in a few days. --Drr-darkomen (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Just one simple problem, the discussion completely ignores all the relevant sources out there. The proposition that Drr-daromen used to justify sources for the section was simply his proposition and not wikipeadia's. Sherdog is a credible source.Sea888 (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)