User talk:Amalas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AID: thanks for your vote!
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
</div>
</div>
Posted by [[User:Pruneau|Pruneau]] 21:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team
Posted by [[User:Pruneau|Pruneau]] 21:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team


==[Talk:Belly dance]==
Sorry I didn't know if you should be included in this or not but since you have said quite a bit in the realavant talk pages and handled the informal mediation, I included you.
{{RFMF}} [[User:Cassandra581|Cassandra581]] 07:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:41, 24 May 2006

Archive
Archives
  1. 3 April 2006 – 18 May 2006

Your interventions

I see that you've been here for only a couple of months; that probably explains much of what's happened in the two cases involving me in which you've intervened. I strongly suggest that you get to know the project better before intervening in other disputes.

I consider, in any case, the Mediation cabal to be a deeply flawed notion, providing little more than a chance for disgruntled editors to try to get their own way when they know that the official/standard channels wouldn't get them anywhere. My three personal experiences of it so far have served only to confirm that view. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  1. If you think that any of the above constitutes biting, you may have some rude shocks in store from other editors (though I hope that you don't). In any case, you chose to intervene in two disputes; if you think of yourself as a newcomer who shouldn't be bitten, then why did you do that?
  2. I carefully didn't say that you chose to mediate; you looked at the pages and issued your verdicts, all without discussing the matter with the participants (or even informing one of them). Mediation can indeed be a good way to proceed, when the parties are involved, and attempts are made to achieve consensus or compromise. My irritation with what actually happened was, I think, justified.
  3. I'm happy, however, to drop the matter and put it behind us. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archive Box

Done your archive box! Computerjoe's talk 15:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Stub

Happy to help. No idea how. Dweller 13:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please help on Mathematics

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mathematics was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 21:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]


[Talk:Belly dance]

Sorry I didn't know if you should be included in this or not but since you have said quite a bit in the realavant talk pages and handled the informal mediation, I included you. Template:RFMF Cassandra581 07:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]