User talk:Bittergrey: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Bittergrey/Archive 2. |
→Edit warring: new section |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|archive = User talk:Bittergrey/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:Bittergrey/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Edit warring == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]  after a review of the reverts you have made on [[:paraphilic infantilism]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate and discuss]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: |
|||
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''{{Break}}You know that both myself and FB object to the removal of these sources. Your claims and comments have achieved no support, and Cantor's hypothesis is not a [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]]. Stop removing it on the basis of your personal preference. Slow edit wars are still edit wars. [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 18:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
Revision as of 18:42, 13 September 2011
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Edit warring
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on paraphilic infantilism. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You know that both myself and FB object to the removal of these sources. Your claims and comments have achieved no support, and Cantor's hypothesis is not a fringe theory. Stop removing it on the basis of your personal preference. Slow edit wars are still edit wars. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 18:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)