User talk:CNMall41

Yuva edits

Hi, I have a question on the Yuva film edits. I added the soundtrack section with a source during my second edit, but it was undone because it's waiting on "consensus"? Genuinely confused what this meant since I had added a valid source in my second attempt. I'm not interested in edit warring so I figured I'd ask you to clear any of my misunderstandings. Thanks! Shrev64 (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the edit history, this was removed several times because it is considered WP:COAT. Listing information about the soundtrack would be acceptable as long as it is from a reliable (not commercial) source. However, the information box and track listings is still COAT and should be placed in its own article if it meets notability guidelines. Edit summaries are listed in the edit history. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for pointing me to WP:COAT. I am aware of the edit summaries, hence my question. I am even more confused by the reasoning because I did include a source - the JioSaavn album page. In addition, almost all Indian film pages have their soundtracks on the same page as the film, unless they were pan-Indian (i.e. multiple-language) releases. Examples of pan-Indian films with separate soundtrack pages include Kantara, Yuvarathnaa, and Pushpa - these are the exceptions. If you see any of the pages on this page, for example, you'll see that the soundtrack section has always been on the same page. So I fail to see how COAT is relevant in this case because as someone who has been editing Indian film pages for quite a while, I have seen no precedent to this, unless it was established recently. Shrev64 (talk) 05:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

You are using an argument from authority and WP:OSE. You may also want to have a look at this page you provided as not all of the soundtracks are as you say. I may be wrong about it (I will admit I have been wrong in the past) so brought it up in a discussion here so it can be revisited. If I am wrong, I will gladly stop removing them. You are more than welcome to participate in that discussion of course as the more people who opine, the clearer the consensus will be. Cheers!

Can you make the box office changes for Salaar in all the linked pages

Here are the list of pages linked to Salaar

1. List of highest-grossing Indian films: [1]

2. List of Indian films of 2023: [2]

3. List of highest-grossing South Indian films: [3]

4. List of highest-grossing Telugu films: [4]

5. List of Telugu films of 2023: [5] Uzumaki787 (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I would not be inclined to do so. You can make such request at the task force page where it was originally brought up for discussion though. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Yeah sure will approach taskforce. But some guy called Wayfarer is reverting your edits and doing some disruptive editings, please look at this [6] Uzumaki787 (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Re: Lolla line-ups

Hi there! Just in case you did not get the alert for my reply. Thank you for acknowledging hahaha. I planned to do the US lineup once the set times are available, but if you wanna do it, that's perfectly fine. Thank you sm and have a nice day! Androptrnt (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

@Androptrnt:, didn't get your ping so thanks for the message. I think you make a good point as I know of at least one artist that was just announced who isn't listed in the official lineup. Probably best to wait until that is available. Cheers and good job on the rest!!--CNMall41 (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You please refrain from disruptive editing and creating repeated drafts daily 3 drafts you will create on same article? It is very strange and amusing. Do not message me. YOU WANT THIS ARTICLE TO BE CREATED OR NOT IN THE FIRST PLACE? THE RELEASE DATE IS APRIL 4 WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Zolgensma (talk) 04:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Jfc go away. Next time will go right to ANI. I don't have time for your nonsense. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I am saying I have already added updated references in the article and why cant you see ? dont tell me no sources in article, If no sources I am here to give you. Nonsense is you.Zolgensma (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Go to the talk page. Make your case for creation. Do not come to my talk page again. Next stop is ANI. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I have already mentioned my case in talk page, you did not reply to me there. Thanks Zolgensma (talk) 04:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Great. Now you need to get consensus from other editors. Leave me the hell alone. Sick of this already. STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE!--CNMall41 (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Sources on fixed gear free style

In the history section I cited sources from library of congress, news articles, and other wiki pages. The youtube videos i tried to keep just for the trick discussion area since videos explain that better. I can add more citations to the history section but i figured it may be overkill and not add any clarity. FixedGearFreeStyle (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

You need secondary reliable sources. See WP:RS. Also, Wikipedia pages cannot be used as a reference for other Wikipedia pages unfortunately. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I added more reporting citations on the topic and resubmitted. FixedGearFreeStyle (talk) 18:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I took a quick look but it appears that you are still using YouTube as a source. Other references do not appear to be reliable. I will leave it up to another reviewer for a second opinion as I would likely decline it as written. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

my first 13 citations are not youtube videos. I cited New York Times article, Libary of congress, US patent office...are these not showing up? FixedGearFreeStyle (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I am either not explaining it correctly or you are not understanding correctly. Regardless, I think we are at an impasse. The draft is still full of unacceptable sources. I will leave for another editor to review. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

If the article contains engough acceptable sources but one youtube video is the whole article considered unacceptable? FixedGearFreeStyle (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Moved youtube links to "external links section". Now there there should be no youtube in main referances FixedGearFreeStyle (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I understand, but this wouldn't be appropriate either per WP:EL. Again, it has been left so another editor can review. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Nate Martin

First two sentences say the same thing. Can you combine them to read “Martin was recruited by Microsoft early in his career and also worked as a software executive for Electronic Arts before founding Puzzle Break, the first escape room company in the United States, in 2013.” MattWrites37 (talk) 21:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I implemented the changes. Although, any additional requests you have I would ask you go through the proper talk page channels. This also allows other editors to review changes since not everyone is always online.--CNMall41 (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello CNMall41,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Edits on Ryze Trampoline Parks

You removed edits and said it was less than neutral. I am pointing out reported injuries that occurred there. In fact, the page has nothing on injuries and I think the page is the one being biased right now because injuries is a huge issue for all trampoline parks but maybe more so at Ryze and Sky Zone (parent company). If you believe the edits can be more neutral, I think you should edit it rather than removing it completely, otherwise it would seem you are working for the company and out to remove objective news about injuries? Theporkypaladin (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

@Theporkypaladin:, saying that I work for the company is a pretty strong accusation which is going to get you nowhere. As I pointed out, you are welcome pursuant to WP:ONUS to discuss on the talk pages of those companies where I will gladly discuss. Wikipedia is also a collaborative environment where everyone has an opportunity to opine so hopefully you are able to get WP:CONSENSUS for the edits. In the meantime, be careful with your accusations as if you cast aspersions again it will be brought up at WP:ANI. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

If you claim to be neutral, as all of us claim to be, why would you remove my edits wholesale with reputable sources quoted and said I am not neutral? I am trying to present a fuller picture of injuries that's occurring around the world, and currently there is no mention of injuries happening in UK and Hong Kong. If you think the tone has an issue, you are welcome to factually edit my writing. By removing it wholesale and then claiming I am not neutral, when I have reputable quoted sources, really makes anyone question who is truly neutral here, and why would you want remove mentions of serious injuries around the world? You seem like really experienced in Wikipedia and trying to use all these technical stuff WP:CONSENSUS etc on me I don't even know how it works. All I know is I pointed out facts through reputable media, and I am surprised you want to remove it wholesale and then claiming I am not neutral. I would like you to invite you to edit my writing if you think its biased, but otherwise with reputable sources like South China Morning Post, you cannot say what I added is wrong or untruthful. In fact I am helping to complete the picture. 112.199.140.44 (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You were provided with the links to guide you but I see that didn't work out. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, an article has been moved to draft with the name Manase Osei Adinkrah.Please the draft name should be AMG Skratch.That is the article's name Nana Adinkrah (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@Nana Adinkrah:, whoever reviews it will create it under the AKA if appropriate, assuming it meets notability guidelines. Cheers!

Dear

Dear I have edited film Rajkumar in a proper way which includes who are the artists and what its about. I hope this time you will approve it.112.199.140.44 (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

At this point it looks like you are using multiple accounts and WP:LOUTSOCKing. Will file an SPI shortly but in the meantime I would have no interest in assisting. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

My first Article

Dear I have written the article for LI-MA - Living Media Art. The name of my draft was changed to just Living Media Art. I wanted to check if that is just temporary? Or if that will be the publishing name?

The name of the institute however is LI-MA which is why it would be very relevant that the article is actually called that. Otherwise people might not find it.

Thanks! Antoniattn (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

The note at the top of the draft already addresses this. Assuming it is notable, the reviewer will determine its common name used in the media and move it to that title. Cheers. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Rashmika Mandanna information about box office

Please provide a justified explanation as to why the topic cannot be mentioned like in the articles for Ranbir Kapoor, Kartik Aaryan, Deepika Padukone and Alia Bhatt? 19Arham (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

You will need to explain what exactly you want mentioned. I am unsure what those pages have to do with this one. I have been slowly going through and cleaning things up so have made quite a few edits over the last day or two. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Information about the box-office of Rashmika's films in the career section. In all FA class articles that information is mentioned. 19Arham (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I responded on the talk page where it should be. Not sure when this became a FA. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft of Ariel Elkin

Hi CNMall41,

You recently declined my draft for an article about Areil Elkin, and I'd like to see how I can improve the article so it gets approved.

The note you left me says 'This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject"- but I believe they do - there is a newspaper article that is explicitly about Elkin and his actions after placing 3rd - the Times of Israel is published, reliable and secondary. There is also an in depth interview that is exclusively with Elkin from Kartcom, another published, reliable and secondary. source, What else should I do? Is it adding more of these source?

I modeled this article on another F4 racer's article Tina Hausmann, whcih uses very similar sources - is it just a matter of adding more of them?

Any guidance would be appreciated Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the draft creation. It looks good but still needs to show how the subject is notable. In order to do so, there needs to be WP:SIGCOV as part of WP:GNG. The only article that would come close would be the one from Times of Israel and that looks more like promotion than independent coverage. The rest are general announcements, interviews, or race stats. For Tina Hausmann, I would not suggest using another Wikipedia as a standard for notability. Maybe for the layout and manual of style but WP:OSE specifically states that another page existing does not make something similar notable. It looks like the page for Hausmann may also be non-notable as it was previously deleted, just recently re-created, and the sourcing also does not appear to be significant coverage. Hope this helps. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Benjamin Freidenberg

Hi, I resubmitted the draft since i believe this is a mistake, please see all sources and I can add more in Hebrew. Thanks Li-reg (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure exactly what you mean by mistake but resubmission without discussion is never a good idea. I will leave a note for reviewers if you are in fact just looking for a second opinion. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Note left so that it doesn't get denied simply for not being improved. In the meantime, I would suggest to fix the referencing issues as there is content that is not supported by references which is not something you want to do when it comes to a BLP. I see it is in queue again so another reviewer should come around shortly. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)