User talk:Chimpu420: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
text <ref>{{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}}</ref> |
text <ref>{{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}}</ref> |
||
<ref>{{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}}</ref> |
|||
Revision as of 07:08, 12 November 2013
Re: Your edits on Persecution of Muslims
Hello, I have noticed that you have undone two edits by an IP. I notice that this IP was trying to make the tone of the article formal and neutral. I am here to discuss about the article and how we can compromise to make appropriate edits to the article to avoid edit warring. Thanks. Darylgolden(talk) 06:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Darylgolden,I made those changes few hours ago,but i think the editing done earlier was correct.You can't probably tell what the nature of attack was especially if it happened in the 18th century.So i guess i'll have no troubles undoing my own changes. Chimpu420 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
text [1]
- ^ "India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted". BBC. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
{{cite web}}:|archive-date=requires|archive-url=(help) - ^ "India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted". BBC. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
{{cite web}}:|archive-date=requires|archive-url=(help)