User talk:Dartslilly: Difference between revisions
Dartslilly (talk | contribs) |
Dartslilly (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-01-27}} </div><!--Volume 16, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2020-01-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> |
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-01-27}} </div><!--Volume 16, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2020-01-27|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:Evad37/SPS]]) --></div></div> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Chris troutman@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=937629431 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Chris troutman@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=937629431 --> |
||
== Reverted My Edit == |
|||
Hello! I saw you reverted my edit on the Throne of Fire Wikipedia page. I understand that the former version was much more detailed, but since the summary has been described as "too long or excessively detailed," I thought that it should be cut down a bit. Were the changes I made not satisfactory? |
|||
[[User:Purplemoonsong|Purplemoonsong]] ([[User talk:Purplemoonsong|talk]]) 16:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:Please discuss article content at the article talk page. [[User:Dartslilly|Dartslilly]] ([[User talk:Dartslilly#top|talk]]) 16:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:53, 3 February 2020
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I just wanted to suggest that you be a bit more verbose on your edit summaries for pending changes when you don't accept the change. The edits caught in pending changes are by newer editors who won't be familiar with common Wikipedia shorthand. For example, on this set of pending changes, you reverted it with the summary el. The new editors aren't going to know or understand that the edit wasn't approved because it contained external links in the body. Either more words in the edit summary or a link to the Wikipedia page that explains it would be more educational for these new editors. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Kalashnikov Concern
Sorry about editing the Kalashnikov Concern page. I was trying to prove to my teacher that Wikipedia IS a reliable source and has good moderation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.174.188.202 (talk) 17:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Yardbirds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howling Wolf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Remove External Link
Hii Dartslilly, Recently you have removed my external from wordpress main body because you think that was not related to the content but the link i have made is completely realted to that content. Mohit Chaprana 17:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrmohit (talk • contribs)
@Mcrmohit: Did you read the policy that I posted on your user talk page? Dartslilly (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Constantinople was the name of the Ottoman capital until 1923- read more about the name-history here: Istanbul
Mavigogun (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- The content in our articles is based on WP:RS and must be neutral and verifiable. We don't accept Wikipedia articles as sources. I would be happy to answer any questions you have about our policies like WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:RS to the best of my ability but discussion about content would be better on the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report