User talk:Giano II: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Right reasons: new section
Giano II (talk | contribs)
→‎Right reasons: Now run along and find something productive to do
Line 30: Line 30:


I assume the irony of yelling at me to "shut my ill-informed mouth" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARockpocket&diff=222674681&oldid=222672644] and in the same breath warning ''me'' against creating further drama isn't lost on you. If you have something further to say to me, feel free to visit my talk page. There's no need for additional bickering in Rockpocket's userspace. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I assume the irony of yelling at me to "shut my ill-informed mouth" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARockpocket&diff=222674681&oldid=222672644] and in the same breath warning ''me'' against creating further drama isn't lost on you. If you have something further to say to me, feel free to visit my talk page. There's no need for additional bickering in Rockpocket's userspace. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Do you know? I really could not care less WTF you think. You are ill-informed and rather ignorant. It's a pity, but there is not a lot I can do about that. If you are hoping I am going to enter into debate with you, and thus create more drama you are mistaken. Now run along and find something productive to do outside in the nice fresh air. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II#top|talk]]) 18:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:37, 30 June 2008

Old messages are at

Please leave new messages below

Right reasons

Yes, I think that Rockpocket blocked for the right reasons. At the time, he believed that

  • the comments he removed represented harrassment of another editor;
  • he was acting within policy to remove those comments and warn against their replacement;
  • he didn't think that the harrassment would cease without a block;
  • a block in that situation was appropriate and well within accepted practice; and
  • he was acting in the best interests of the project.

Was he correct in all of those beliefs? Nope. The result? Bad block, good reasons.

I assume the irony of yelling at me to "shut my ill-informed mouth" [1] and in the same breath warning me against creating further drama isn't lost on you. If you have something further to say to me, feel free to visit my talk page. There's no need for additional bickering in Rockpocket's userspace. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know? I really could not care less WTF you think. You are ill-informed and rather ignorant. It's a pity, but there is not a lot I can do about that. If you are hoping I am going to enter into debate with you, and thus create more drama you are mistaken. Now run along and find something productive to do outside in the nice fresh air. Giano (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]