User talk:GoneAwayNowAndRetired: Difference between revisions
→John Patrick Bedell: new section |
→Disruptive? RE: John Patrick Bedell: link corrected |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
How are my well supported and referenced edits - done by myself, an IP editor with a varied edit history who uses talk and edit summaries disruptive when what I'm doing is removing blended text which relies entirely on a SPA's interpretation of a blog mirror from 4 years ago and which is entered with neither talk nor summary?[[Special:Contributions/99.151.172.170|99.151.172.170]] ([[User talk:99.151.172.170|talk]]) 19:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
How are my well supported and referenced edits - done by myself, an IP editor with a varied edit history who uses talk and edit summaries disruptive when what I'm doing is removing blended text which relies entirely on a SPA's interpretation of a blog mirror from 4 years ago and which is entered with neither talk nor summary?[[Special:Contributions/99.151.172.170|99.151.172.170]] ([[User talk:99.151.172.170|talk]]) 19:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for your response. (None was given) It's always nice to see an Editor consider their actions. I would have liked to have seen you do so. Here is my edit:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Patrick_Bedell&oldid=347957611#Beliefs] and here is the somewhat unintelligible supposed "undoing of vandalism" you put in its place:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Patrick_Bedell&oldid=347959470#Beliefs]. I trust you can see the difference, vandalism my edit was not. _[[Special:Contributions/99.151.172.170|99.151.172.170]] ([[User talk:99.151.172.170|talk]]) 19:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
:Thanks for your response. (None was given) It's always nice to see an Editor consider their actions. I would have liked to have seen you do so. Here is my edit:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Patrick_Bedell&oldid=347957611#Beliefs] and here is the somewhat unintelligible supposed "undoing of vandalism" you put in its place:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Patrick_Bedell&oldid=347959470#Beliefs]. I trust you can see the difference, vandalism my edit was not. _[[Special:Contributions/99.151.172.170|99.151.172.170]] ([[User talk:99.151.172.170|talk]]) 19:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Your name has been mentioned at AN/I[http://en.wikipedia.org/ |
::Your name has been mentioned at AN/I[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#John_Patrick_Bedell] with regards to the vandal whose edit you've supported.[[Special:Contributions/99.151.172.170|99.151.172.170]] ([[User talk:99.151.172.170|talk]]) 20:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
== John Patrick Bedell == |
== John Patrick Bedell == |
||
Revision as of 20:21, 5 March 2010
Wikipedia is broken and failing
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Committees
Happy Labor Day!
Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A NobodyMy talk 05:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Happy Halloween!
As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 18:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Happy Thanksgiving!
I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 06:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
I know you are lurking
I miss you man. I am going to quote your essay in ANI today. Ikip (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
A NobodyMy talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Hope Life is good. Suspect you are reading WR, not this but what the hell :) ViridaeTalk 05:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Disruptive? RE: John Patrick Bedell
How are my well supported and referenced edits - done by myself, an IP editor with a varied edit history who uses talk and edit summaries disruptive when what I'm doing is removing blended text which relies entirely on a SPA's interpretation of a blog mirror from 4 years ago and which is entered with neither talk nor summary?99.151.172.170 (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. (None was given) It's always nice to see an Editor consider their actions. I would have liked to have seen you do so. Here is my edit:[1] and here is the somewhat unintelligible supposed "undoing of vandalism" you put in its place:[2]. I trust you can see the difference, vandalism my edit was not. _99.151.172.170 (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Your name has been mentioned at AN/I[3] with regards to the vandal whose edit you've supported.99.151.172.170 (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
John Patrick Bedell
Hi there,GoneAwayNowAndRetired
Could you possibly restore the shooting section to the John Patrick Bedell article?.
Its protected now so I can't and I wrote a good deal of it! You had it back the this happened DIFF? Most of the story gone ! But all the bloggy crap still in. Help!
You may have mistaken what 99.151.172.170 ws doing as they have been reverting a definite edit warrer 97.119.97.118. (who I gave a 3RR warning) Thanks for your time! :-)--220.101.28.25 (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)