User talk:Knowwiso: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Knowwiso (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
IIIraute (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


DO YOU OR WIKIPEDIA HAVE AN ISSUE WITH HISTORY ?
DO YOU OR WIKIPEDIA HAVE AN ISSUE WITH HISTORY ?

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]], as you did at [[:West Germany]]. Your edits have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant notice boards]].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 -->

Revision as of 05:50, 7 August 2013

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at West Germany shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page. Thank you. --IIIraute (talk) 05:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@ IIIRAUTE

THIS TOPIC IS CURRENTLY BEING DISCUSSED IN THE BUNDESTAG & BUNDESRAT IN BERLIN, GERMANY.

THIS TOPIC IS HISTORY SINCE 1949.

DO YOU OR WIKIPEDIA HAVE AN ISSUE WITH HISTORY ?

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at West Germany. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.