User talk:LuckyLouie: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:: Hardly any reliable sources exist on the topic. Joe Nickell is the only article online[http://www.csicop.org/si/show/enfield_poltergeist]. As for books only two reliable books mentions it: Milbourne Christopher. (1970). ESP, Seers & Psychics. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. pp. 124–31 and Bob Couttie (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. [[User:Fodor Fan|Fodor Fan]] ([[User talk:Fodor Fan|talk]]) 13:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC) |
:: Hardly any reliable sources exist on the topic. Joe Nickell is the only article online[http://www.csicop.org/si/show/enfield_poltergeist]. As for books only two reliable books mentions it: Milbourne Christopher. (1970). ESP, Seers & Psychics. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. pp. 124–31 and Bob Couttie (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. [[User:Fodor Fan|Fodor Fan]] ([[User talk:Fodor Fan|talk]]) 13:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
Once again this is false information, The Enfield Poltergeist is a British case, How can american Journalists be credible sources....The only source that can be relied on is a book Entitled This house is haunted by Guy Lyon Playfair. |
Once again this is false information, The Enfield Poltergeist is a British case, How can american Journalists be credible sources....The only source that can be relied on is a book Entitled This house is haunted by Guy Lyon Playfair. |
||
== December 2013 == |
== December 2013 == |
Revision as of 16:46, 8 December 2013
LuckyLouie is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nensha
Is it possible change the article name nensha to Thoughtography? Fodor Fan (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- yes...use the "move" tab. BTW, have any sources for Enfield Poltergeist? LuckyLouie (talk) 13:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hardly any reliable sources exist on the topic. Joe Nickell is the only article online[1]. As for books only two reliable books mentions it: Milbourne Christopher. (1970). ESP, Seers & Psychics. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. pp. 124–31 and Bob Couttie (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. Fodor Fan (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Once again this is false information, The Enfield Poltergeist is a British case, How can american Journalists be credible sources....The only source that can be relied on is a book Entitled This house is haunted by Guy Lyon Playfair.
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Poltergeist may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Robbie Mannheim]] (1949), claimed to be [[demonic possession|demonically possessed] after using a [[Ouija board]].
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Why did you change my revisions? why have you added stuff about the Warrens? They had nothing to do with the case?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.111.196 (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The Enfield Poltergeist
It seems that a completely False reporting of the Enfield poltergeist is now being reported and you are one of the proliferators?? why are you promoting the Conjuring 2 movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.111.196 (talk) 16:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)