User talk:LuckyLouie: Difference between revisions
Judgejoker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
It seems that a completely False reporting of the Enfield poltergeist is now being reported and you are one of the proliferators?? |
It seems that a completely False reporting of the Enfield poltergeist is now being reported and you are one of the proliferators?? |
||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. Your edits have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. |
|||
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant notice boards]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. |
|||
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> |
|||
Revision as of 08:13, 9 December 2013
 | LuckyLouie is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Nensha
Is it possible change the article name nensha to Thoughtography? Fodor Fan (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- yes...use the "move" tab. BTW, have any sources for Enfield Poltergeist? LuckyLouie (talk) 13:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hardly any reliable sources exist on the topic. Joe Nickell is the only article online[1]. As for books only two reliable books mentions it: Milbourne Christopher. (1970). ESP, Seers & Psychics. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. pp. 124–31 and Bob Couttie (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. Fodor Fan (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Once again this is false information, The Enfield Poltergeist is a British case, How can american Journalists be credible sources....The only source that can be relied on is a book Entitled This house is haunted by Guy Lyon Playfair.
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Poltergeist may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Robbie Mannheim]] (1949), claimed to be [[demonic possession|demonically possessed] after using a [[Ouija board]].
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Why did you change my revisions? why have you added stuff about the Warrens? They had nothing to do with the case?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.111.196 (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
The Enfield Poltergeist
It seems that a completely False reporting of the Enfield poltergeist is now being reported and you are one of the proliferators??
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.