User talk:Madrugada11/Wilbour Papyrus/Epichippo Peer Review
Lead Section
I am assuming since there were only changes to the Content and Purpose, there was no intentional change for the lead, and you are keeping the original article. Reading the original article, I do think maybe one thing could be expanded upon more. Would you consider writing a sentence or two that expands on the importance of the wilbour papyrus itself? Either than that, I don't think there's anything else that should be changed, it seems that it's all very straight to the point. Epichippo (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Clarity of Article Structure
I do believe the sections are organized well, I especially like how the Content & Purpose section is curated with the land and taxation/rent. I don't think anything should be changed in this aspect. Because there is not much information on this paper, and is relatively self-explanatory, I think it's very cut and dry. Epichippo (talk) 00:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)