User talk:Netoholic: Difference between revisions
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
→Philosopher: new section |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
== [[Philosopher]] == |
|||
{{uw-ew}}<br> |
|||
You're at 4RR on this article. Please step back. The article should reflect mainstream sources and views. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 13:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:27, 30 May 2014
Click here to add a new comment section
"They are never alone that are accompanied with noble thoughts."
|
"To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
|
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philosopher, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Media and National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You're at 4RR on this article. Please step back. The article should reflect mainstream sources and views. SPECIFICO talk 13:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)