User talk:PhantomTech: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 27 January 2013

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Welcome!

Hello, PhantomTech, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) PhantomTech (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Section//// At the time of the "Speedy Deletion" process, my ass was not occupying the vicinity of the black hole connection to the world wide web, and thereby i was not able to respond to the execution of your machinisms although not surprised of such behavioral mechanics, it is clear that the grounds of this deletion " Vandalism: G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion)"- were, to say the least, vandalistic of truth, Although the confusion, which is not to be confused with the insight of their balutativity, of the different poles of the elegant body of the donkey, is a well spread virus, an anymore obvious blindness for the change of form, for that is what this in-formation discrepancy is abalut, if not, I must asume that it is the deeper meaning that is referred to as being"recreated"-although i sont see such a word as containing any real balutative value, since it is agains the spiral nature of Balutation to exactly repeat/re-create, I absobalutly agree, the underlying balutativeness of the two discriptions of "Balutology" are the same, and taking this possibility of "grounds for deletion" I must asume that you are on your way to understand more of the Balutivity of the grand Balit, and thereby "Balutology" - For this I will with all my Balutivity, to congratulate and honor you, and seeing that there "deep within the ass of a Don-key lies the seed of a head" My worries for the future of recognized Balutivity is beyond deletion.

Salut! Balut! /Balut 64