User talk:Pythagimedes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:
{{reply to|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68}} My apologies. Based on the WP Manual of Style, articles should not be written like a narrative. The standard is to write dispassionately without adding emotional language. Also, everything you write on wikipedia can be edited freely by other people when appropriate, so it is not really ''your'' narrative anyway, although I completely understand why you would feel attached to it. [[User:Pythagimedes|Pythagimedes]] ([[User talk:Pythagimedes#top|talk]]) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
{{reply to|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68}} My apologies. Based on the WP Manual of Style, articles should not be written like a narrative. The standard is to write dispassionately without adding emotional language. Also, everything you write on wikipedia can be edited freely by other people when appropriate, so it is not really ''your'' narrative anyway, although I completely understand why you would feel attached to it. [[User:Pythagimedes|Pythagimedes]] ([[User talk:Pythagimedes#top|talk]]) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


::What kind of response is that? We are not "writing an article" on your talk page, and yet not only do you remain "dispassionate", you refer to the wrong emotional issue in my complaint! [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|talk]]) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
:What kind of response is that? We are not "writing an article" on your talk page, and yet not only do you remain "dispassionate", you refer to the wrong emotional issue in my complaint! [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|talk]]) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


::{{reply to|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68}} My response above was to your original question asking why I removed the word "dismal" from an article. I was not talking about my talk page. I removed the word "dismal" from the article in question, because I felt it was inconsistent with Wikipedia's encyclopedic tone, which is dispassionate. [[User:Pythagimedes|Pythagimedes]] ([[User talk:Pythagimedes#top|talk]]) 02:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
::{{reply to|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68}} My response above was to your original question asking why I removed the word "dismal" from an article. I was not talking about my talk page. I removed the word "dismal" from the article in question, because I felt it was inconsistent with Wikipedia's encyclopedic tone, which is dispassionate. [[User:Pythagimedes|Pythagimedes]] ([[User talk:Pythagimedes#top|talk]]) 02:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

:::I already know your response was to the article and not to the talk page! My question for you was and is: ''Why'' did you respond to the article and not recognize the emotional issue presented on your talk page about the article. Even failures at clerical work have their hard moments. Has Wikipedia become this much a grind that our feelings about sharing knowledge with others has its end in "take it up with the union rep?" or something? Vargas Milan, 3:51a CST, 11 Feb 2021. ([[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68|talk]]))

Revision as of 08:57, 11 February 2021

Cookies for you!

Cookies!

Biochemistry&Love has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Thank you kindly for your input on a discussion with me on a Talk page. Wikipedia needs more editors like you that are willing to agree to disagree. Keep up the good work! ―Biochemistry🙴 19:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hypatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great Books

Why did you remove the word "dismal" altogether from my narrative? How would you feel if you had worked on something for two years, and it had amounted to nearly nothing? Heartsick. You would feel heartsick. 2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68: My apologies. Based on the WP Manual of Style, articles should not be written like a narrative. The standard is to write dispassionately without adding emotional language. Also, everything you write on wikipedia can be edited freely by other people when appropriate, so it is not really your narrative anyway, although I completely understand why you would feel attached to it. Pythagimedes (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of response is that? We are not "writing an article" on your talk page, and yet not only do you remain "dispassionate", you refer to the wrong emotional issue in my complaint! 2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68: My response above was to your original question asking why I removed the word "dismal" from an article. I was not talking about my talk page. I removed the word "dismal" from the article in question, because I felt it was inconsistent with Wikipedia's encyclopedic tone, which is dispassionate. Pythagimedes (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already know your response was to the article and not to the talk page! My question for you was and is: Why did you respond to the article and not recognize the emotional issue presented on your talk page about the article. Even failures at clerical work have their hard moments. Has Wikipedia become this much a grind that our feelings about sharing knowledge with others has its end in "take it up with the union rep?" or something? Vargas Milan, 3:51a CST, 11 Feb 2021. (2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk))