User talk:Random832: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
rm signpost and sandbox CSD |
archiving |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#ifexist:User talk:Random832/Archive 10|[[User talk:Random832/Archive 10|10]] }}{{red|Time to reorder}}}} |
#ifexist:User talk:Random832/Archive 10|[[User talk:Random832/Archive 10|10]] }}{{red|Time to reorder}}}} |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Monster energy display.jpg)== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Monster energy display.jpg]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== About Image:BlueCaper.svg == |
|||
I uploaded as a refurnishing of my PNG logo, and I don't know any Wikimedia Commons admins, so, could you please tag it for deletion? It does not show on either Commons or 'Pedia. I tried right-clicking the picture and clicking "Show Picture," but it did not show. Since you may be busy, I will contact two other administrators to ensure that <b>the SVG file, <u>not</u> the PNG file,<b> is deleted. Thanks, and bye! -[[User:BlueCaper|'''<em style="font-family:Georgia;color:blue">Blue'''</font>'''''<em style = "font-family:Georgia;color:black">Caper'''''</em>]] [[User talk:BlueCaper|(talk)]] 12:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Done}}--[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 19:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Damian == |
|||
You seem to have completely misunderstood. When Jimbo stepped aside he specifically said it should not be taken as either pro or against unbanning. There is no reason it should lead to an automatic unban. If it wasn't for Thatcher, Damian would still be banned. A partial unban is not imposing sanctions. --[[User:Apoc2400|Apoc2400]] ([[User talk:Apoc2400|talk]]) 16:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:No, I understand it perfectly. Arbcom had no involvement in the original ban, and it's widely accepted that ordinary admins do not have the authority to demand an arbcom appeal for their own actions (c.f. Durova/!!) And ''If it wasn't for Thatcher, Damian would still be banned'' is simply not true - He would still have been ''blocked'', but from that moment his block would not be a ban. Once Jimbo stepped aside, any admin may have unblocked him. --[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] ([[special:contributions/Random832|contribs]]) 22:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== CSD automatic dropdown broken == |
|||
I saw that you're listed as a maintainer of [[MediaWiki:Sysop.js]]. As such, could you drop by [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#CSD automatic dropdown broken]] and leave your two cents worth about the problem/how to fix it? Thanks. --''[[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Philosopher|Let us reason together.]]</sup> 08:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*Thanks for your attention to this problem. I don't know how this problem arose or how to fix it, but I appreciate the fact that you are trying to solve it. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 09:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Yuletide == |
|||
It doesn't matter what holiday, as long as you celebrate! |
|||
{{Yuletide}} |
|||
[[User:BlueCaper|'''<em style="font-family:Georgia;color:blue">Blue</em>'''<em style="font-family:Georgia;color:black">'''''Caper</em>''''']] ([[User talk:BlueCaper|talk]]) 15:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== re: your post on WT:RfArb == |
|||
I'm surprised they made it five days without people telling them how "useless" they are, with the amount of negativity that was aimed at ArbCom previously. (you're not even the first one, White Cat had you beat earlier today). How about actually, you know, giving them a chance? Not saying if I think their decision was right, but come on, the only remedy that was left after this decision was "Everyking will not interact with or comment about Snowspinner." if that's a sticking point for EK, I really question what EK would do if this was lifted. So, let's mark it closed, and let old, hard feelings die. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 17:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I am extremely disappointed that they refused to even vote on EK's proposals. I do not consider the matter to be closed, and if he does not bring it up on schedule in february, I will. It's a sticking point because, ''as he said'', it means that he is not a user in good standing. Why can't you take him at his word there instead of insinuating that there's some sinister agenda behind it? --[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] ([[special:contributions/Random832|contribs]]) 17:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::[[Argumentum ad nauseum]] isn't going to win you or him any more converts to his viewpoint on this, Random. It's going to be drama for drama's sake. EK can deal with the 99.99% of Wikipedia that doesn't have to deal with a three+ year old grudge. He's in good standing as far as I (and apparently the ArbCom) as concerned. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 17:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Editnotice == |
|||
At [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_46#Custom_edit_messages]], you said, "I've worked out a system for allowing a non-admin to maintain the editnotice without requiring a protected edit request every time and without allowing anyone else to edit it." Apparently that didn't happen; when not logged in, I had no trouble editing [[User:Dank55/Editnotice]], even though [[User:Dank55/Editnotice.css]] says "off". Is there a way to stop others from editing [[User:Dank55/Editnotice]] and [[User_talk:Dank55/Editnotice]] by fiddling with .css or .js files, without protecting the pages? Tra's comments at [[Wikipedia:VPT#Editnotice]] may be helpful. (Watchlisting) - Dan [[User:Dank55|Dank55]] ([[User talk:Dank55|send/receive]]) 03:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Deletion review for [[:Assburger Syndrome]]== |
|||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Assburger Syndrome|deletion review]] of [[:Assburger Syndrome]]. Since you were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> ~[[User:CortalUX|<strong style="color:blue;">Cortal</strong>]][[User_Talk:CortalUX|<strong style="color:green;">UX</strong><sup>Talk?</sup>]] 03:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||