User talk:Recollected

Archives

Survivor

Please fix the cite error. Thanks. ```Buster Seven Talk 23:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Millers (season 1)

You have been editing there for a month and a half and all of a sudden you just fucking delete it??? You don't delete it when it was made instead? What the fuck's that all about??? YOU NEVER HAD A GOD DAMN PROBLEM WITH IT BEFORE!!!! 97.107.58.195 (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, you should refer to WP:CALM. Second, I can see this is the second article you've created that's been redirected so I can understand why you're angry. Yes, I was adding titles/ratings along with another user who was adding episode summaries. That was it. Upon further review, I came to the conclusion that the season article - like I've stated multiple times in edit summaries - wasn't substantial or notable enough. The synopsis was a copy and paste from the main article with the lead being 1 sentence. All of that information - again, like I stated in prior summaries - is available via the main The Millers article or the List of The Millers episodes. Complaining and cussing at editors isn't going to get you anywhere. Cheers. – Recollected • 18:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry for my harsh language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.107.58.195 (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could help get an article started? (pretty please with sugar on top?)

Famous in 12 a new show by Harvey Levin-very interesting idea he has there. I can fill-in some content and refs. but starting an article is not my thing. I thought that I requested it? but there is a backlog it seems. I think this link could be a press-release/article----I'm trying to cite all press releases as such? But here is some info. about it http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2014/06/02/famous-in-12/9774869/24.0.133.234 (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

– Recollected • 00:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Nice article! I hope they don't get cancelled early lol. You're awesome-you know you deserve more barnstars so here you go24.0.133.234 (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Haves and the Have Nots

Hi Recollected! Just thought I would alert you that the past few edits have really affected the organized, well-structured format of your page for The Haves and the Have Nots TV series. I am sure the last editor did not mean to but the episode grid is no longer legible :-(

Hey Willow! I've restored the list so everything should be alright now. Happy editing! Recollected (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! Thanks so much :-)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Tips Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coyote Ugly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

Hi Recollected- I have a question about ratings. So it appears that you have been using the 18-49 numbers? Is there a reason for this or can you point me to any discussion about this? (and yes i know why those #s are supposedly "key"...) If you notice for example the season 6 Real HW of NJ ratings. Is this standard for you choosing those demos? If-so I think we may want to specify that, and actually I would prefer using the "overall" numbers, but I do not want to suggest anything that would cause you to NOT update tv-shows ratings info.-thanks again24.0.133.234 (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]