User talk:Sargonious/Archive 5

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Assyrian people

The page is protected. The talk page explains it all.סרגון יוחנא 21:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

if you could avoid this sort of thing please? Don't archive active sections. Least of all by page moves, it messes up editing history, and don't use the archiving process as a tool of content disputes. Try to address good faith concerns with good faith arguments, even if you are Satan or whatever. dab (ᛏ) 19:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Knock it off, Sargon. Khoikhoi 23:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm just asking you to stop archiving active discussion. Khoikhoi 23:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Archiving

All i see is a mess! A total mess! I am really not following the chronology of events! I can't follow the mess re to the archiving process!!! -- Szvest 23:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up ®}

The solution to that is what i did (not just being bold but Archive 5 is soooo short!). I hope it is ok now. -- Szvest 23:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Lol...what? Khoikhoi 23:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, things were still being disucssed and now it's all in the archives. To me it doesn't look like a mess... Khoikhoi 23:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You can restart discussions. You can copy and paste them. There are a lot of ways but is it acceptable to witness an edit warring about stupid stuff? -- Szvest 23:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't see why we should have to restart it if it's already there. Every time a talk page gets three threads it's time to archive? It's easier to have it all on one page for everyone to see it. By archiving it all you are essentially stopping everything short. Khoikhoi 23:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Back to my first comment then...So what was the reason of archiving a short discussion? -- Szvest 23:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure what Sargon's reason was. :-( Khoikhoi 23:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

It was not a short discussion.

It was starting to drag.סרגון יוחנא 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make comments like this again. It is considered a personal attack, and also violates WP:TROLL. Thank you. Khoikhoi 01:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I am not "abusing my privelages", please provide evidence. It was obvious that it was intended as an insult; don't do it again. Khoikhoi 03:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Blanking talk page

I blank my talk page every now and then because you keep filling it with your blatant nonsense. --Benne ['bɛnə] _(talk) 09:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

It's Jimbo's request to delete unsourced material. Khoikhoi 23:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dude you're using policy to enact whatever you want. You're interpreting policy in your own view.סרגון יוחנא

Hardly. Give me a few minutes to find the email. Khoikhoi 23:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Here you go: [1] Khoikhoi 00:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

No, but it's unsourced. Khoikhoi 00:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Again you're interpreting it in your own way. It specifically mentions preposterous claims when using an example. You are not free to interpret rules just to suit your needs.סרגון יוחנא 00:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Re Khoikhoi is reverting anything I contribute to.

Hi Sargon. I've just checked that and found that Khoikhoi has been reverting unsourced material. You say [sic] You will find sources. In the mean time stop reverting it. In order to sort this out, why could you not bring the sources. The material you are inserting is important and does not concern a phrase or a word but 2 paragraphs. So, please bring the sources as per WP:OR and WP:V. Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 09:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Iraq page move

Hi again Sargon. Thanks for the note. It is fixed now. -- Szvest → ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Quote

Thanks! I like it too. Khoikhoi 23:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Araden

Khon, kha nasha kim darele anna souratha, bas daha kebe shakele (take them out.) Merry tali ayet kim daretle and thats final, because he released all the rights to it with the copyring declerations he made. Awa nasha adeoukhile?Chaldean 00:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Akhoun Sargonious, Araden eela raba shapirta. Qamodee biryinwah gou Canada?? :( Šarukinu 18:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked again

This silly edit — http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_kings_of_Babylon&diff=106053453&oldid=104493504 — got you blocked again. You're off for 24 hours until you can try to be constructive. — Gareth Hughes 14:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

re. I am being blatantly insulted here by Garzo and Chaldean.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garzo#That_was_not_a_silly_edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sargonious (talk • contribs)

The block by Gareth is totally right. I am checking the facts w/ Chaldean now. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 14:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

It's not the block I'm referring to but rather their behavior and condesending tone.The Tsar is Gone but I am King 14:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Really, I just don't see any Gareth's bad behaviour Sang. You were blocked for a sillyness. You are not a newbie and edits like those just can't be done by established users like you, especially that it is not the first time. I just hope you be careful and avoid controversies. Do you have any idea about the webpage linked by Chaldean? -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 15:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it's an insult site where you can add people's names in the URL to be insulted. I'm sure he made it.12.15.7.70 15:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Ok, i'll wait for his answer before taking action. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 15:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Misunderstanding...

Sorry khoun, I didn't imply you were arguing against the Assyrian identity, I just thought you meant that Assyrian kings did not refer to themselves as Assyrian. Šarukinu 02:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Chaldeans are not Contemporary Assyrians!

As a matter of fact, I'm not telkepphe. Mr. Sargon you are assyrian & you are not chaldean. You coming from Baghdad does not necessarily make you chaldean. So stop lying & harassing me with your bias info & lies. Research your material & give me unbiased sources that do not come from bias informant, reporters, or author who got their info from unreliable sources that have been not researched before being published like the sources that are biased from the chaldean wiki. GO FIGURE!!! --KALMANI 23:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Get a clue... Chaldeans and Assyrians are one people you confused lost soul. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.60.34.207 (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

You know what is so funny, your main argument so far about Chaldeans are Assyrians is that you are a Chaldean Catholic and you know that you are an Assyrian, my friend welcome to the real world, no one cares what you think, back up your argument, i could also make an account called Assyrian, and start writing that all Assyrians are Chaldeans, but fortunately for you, I dont go that level. You have yet not proven that Chaldeans are contemporary Assyrian, and the only source you have provided me and wikipedia is the same source you can find in every single website about Assyrians, word for word, its called copy and paste, and it is also called, anyone can put up a website on the internet. I am here to make a deal with you and user Chaldean, since we find it very hard to put an end to each other's arguments, why can't we agrre to write that Chaldeans are the Catholics belonging to the Chaldean Catholic Church??? Think about it.

Proffesor Marco Asm ccc 04:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)