User talk:Tide rolls: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Changed protection level of User talk:Tide rolls: Persistent vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
Cosman246 (talk | contribs)
Line 76: Line 76:
:What evidence? &nbsp; — '''<span style="background:Yellow;color:Blue;">[[User:Jeff G.|Jeff]] [[User:Jeff G./talk|G.&nbsp; ツ]]</span>''' 23:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
:What evidence? &nbsp; — '''<span style="background:Yellow;color:Blue;">[[User:Jeff G.|Jeff]] [[User:Jeff G./talk|G.&nbsp; ツ]]</span>''' 23:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
::Damn, Jeff. Must you ''always'' get right to the point? ''':P''' [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 23:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
::Damn, Jeff. Must you ''always'' get right to the point? ''':P''' [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 23:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

== Reverting edits considered harmful ==

Sorry about that. Perhaps I should explain the edit.

Recently, I have updated the Jargon File (as it's in the public domain and ESR hasn't edited it in years), and I'm trying to change the links as to reflect the new editorship of said file. That's why I changed the external link

Revision as of 01:18, 1 August 2011


Template:Archive box collapsible

outside/outwith/without

Hello: thank you for your reply and explanation. I agree with your point about Scots. However,you might find this link linguistically interesting: http://www.jeremytaylor.eu/outwith.htm Best wishes: Ceartas (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ootwi...I will add that to my vocabulary. Thanks for the link. Tiderolls 20:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For dealing with all the vandalism I see faster, more efficiently and more effectively than I can. ItsZippy (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see you're a trumpet player. Brass players will always succeed. Keep on keepin' on. Thanks for the recognition. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Levi Stubbs

I'm not clear on why my edit was"unconstructive." Available evidence point to the edit as being accurate.68.160.52.145 (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence?   — Jeff G.  ツ 23:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, Jeff. Must you always get right to the point? :P Tiderolls 23:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits considered harmful

Sorry about that. Perhaps I should explain the edit.

Recently, I have updated the Jargon File (as it's in the public domain and ESR hasn't edited it in years), and I'm trying to change the links as to reflect the new editorship of said file. That's why I changed the external link